Newsletter - 22nd February 2018
Ancestry offer FREE access to UK & Ireland records ENDS SUNDAY
LostCousins is FREE this weekend ENDS MONDAY
Findmypast offer extended ENDS WEDNESDAY
Buckinghamshire gets coloured tithe maps
How to research your Irish ancestors
Ancient Britons 'replaced' by newcomers
MASTERCLASS: What to do with your autosomal DNA
results
Review: Marjorie
- Too Afraid to Cry
Review: The
Vanished Child ONLY
99P UNTIL MONDAY
The LostCousins newsletter is usually published
2 or 3 times a month. To access the previous newsletter (dated 9th February)
click here; to find earlier articles use the
customised Google search below (it searches ALL of the newsletters since
February 2009, so you don't need to keep copies):
Whenever
possible links are included to the websites or articles mentioned in the
newsletter (they are highlighted in blue or purple and underlined, so you can't miss
them). If one of the links doesn't work this normally indicates that you're
using adblocking software - you need to make the LostCousins site an exception
(or else use a different browser, such as Chrome).
To go to the main LostCousins website click the
logo at the top of this newsletter. If you're not already a member, do join -
it's FREE, and you'll get an email to alert you whenever there's a new edition
of this newsletter available!
Ancestry
offer FREE access to UK & Ireland records ENDS SUNDAY
From Friday 23rd February
until midnight on Sunday 26th February all of Ancestry's UK & Ireland records
are free at Ancestry.co.uk
You'll have to log-in or
register, but you won’t be asked to buy a subscription or provide credit card
details (unless you inadvertently try to access records which aren't include in
the offer).
Please use this link
- it will take you to a page where all the free record sets are listed.
LostCousins is
FREE this weekend ENDS
MONDAY
Searching for cousins is
always free, but to initiate contact with a new cousin normally requires a
LostCousins subscription - however from Friday 23rd February until Monday 26th
February you can contact the living relatives you find without paying a penny.
Tip: it doesn’t matter whether your cousin responds
before the offer ends, so long as you initiate contact before midnight on
Monday.
How do you make the most of
this opportunity? By adding to your My
Ancestors page all the relatives you can find on the 1881 Census. Why 1881?
Because this is the census your cousins are most likely to have used.
Remember, ALL of your cousins
are descended from the branches of your tree - that's what makes them cousins -
so research as many branches as you can, following them through the censuses until
you get to 1881.
Tip: the 1881 censuses are always free, but having access
to other censuses is a big help - that's why I've timed this offer to coincide
with Ancestry's free weekend.
Findmypast
offer extended ENDS
WEDNESDAY
You can save up to £28 when
you take out a NEW Pro or World subscription to Findmypast and claim a free
LostCousins subscription - see this article
in the last newsletter for more details of this offer, which has been extended
until the end of February. You MUST use the link in the article.
Note: the offers do not apply to existing Findmypast
subscribers, only to new and lapsed subscribers.
Buckinghamshire
gets coloured tithe maps
The Genealogist has added
full colour tithe maps for Buckinghamshire; tithe maps for most other English
counties are also available (though not London), but the only other counties
with colour maps at this point are Middlesex, Surrey, Northumberland, and
Westmorland (plus the city of York).
Tip: you can save £20 on a Diamond subscription when
you follow this link.
You'll also get a free subscription to the online magazine 'Discover Your
Ancestors', worth £24.99
How to research
your Irish ancestors
The Irish Genealogical
Research Society has posted several video tutorials to help researchers with
Irish ancestry - you'll find them here
(and they're free). UPDATE: only members are now able to
view the videos.
Ancient
Britons 'replaced' by newcomers
Britain has been invaded many
times, but the evidence is that the invaders merged with the existing
population rather than displacing it - except when the so-called 'Beaker'
people arrived 4500 years ago.
According to research
published in Nature and summarised in
this BBC article,
90% of the gene pool was replaced within a few hundred years, suggesting that
the indigenous population had virtually died out. This could have been the
result of the invaders being better adapted to a changing climate (the
population of Britain was already falling between 3500BC and 2500BC) or,
perhaps, because they brought with them diseases to which the British
population had no natural resistance.
I'd like to think that before
spending out on a DNA test you re-read what I'd written about DNA over the past
year.
If you didn't, now is the
chance to put that right - and I'm repeating below my Masterclass which sets
out how to deal with the 10,000 or more matches that you'll get when you test
with Ancestry.
Note: if you haven't tested your DNA yet see this article
for the latest offers (the Ancestry DNA offers in North America end on Sunday).
MASTERCLASS:
What to do with your autosomal DNA results
Originally published
in August 2017, I'm reproducing it here (with revisions) for your convenience
Introduction
No matter how much experience
you might have as a family historian, it would be understandable if, when the
results of your DNA test came through, you were completely flummoxed about what
to do next. There's a simple reason for this - we're used to working backwards
from what we already know, so there's a clearly defined path, ie: find our
ancestor's baptism in order to discover (or confirm) who their parents were,
then find the parents' marriage, then find the baptisms of the parents and so on,
working back a generation at a time.
The challenge
But when we're matched with a
genetic cousin, someone who appears to have inherited an identical segment of
DNA, we're faced with a very different challenge. Most of the matches we make
with DNA cousins will be many generations, since we have many more distant
cousins than we do close cousins. The final column of the table below indicates
roughly how many cousins you might expect to find if you and they all took the
Ancestry DNA test:
Based on Table 2 from: Henn
BM, Hon L, Macpherson JM, Eriksson N, Saxonov S, Pe'er I, et al. (2012) Cryptic Distant Relatives Are Common in Both
Isolated and Cosmopolitan Genetic Samples. PLoS ONE 7(4): e34267.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034267
Revised using Ancestry DNA
estimates for the chances of detecting cousins and the expected number of 1st
to 6th cousins for those of British ancestry; the numbers for 7th to 10th
cousins are my own guesstimates
Of course, in practice only a
small fraction of your cousins will have tested - even Ancestry, the biggest
providers of autosomal tests, have only sold about 10 million tests - but you
can nevertheless reckon that the cousins you're matched with will be
distributed roughly in proportion to the figures shown above. In other words,
over 99% of your matches will be with relatives who are at best 5th cousins,
and could well be 8th cousins or even more distant.
Tip: Ancestry won't show any of your DNA matches as
more distant than '5th to 8th cousin', but it's very likely that amongst them
there are many who are more distant - possibly as many as half of them. Once
you get beyond 3rd cousins the length of the shared segment(s) is only a very
rough guide to how closely you are related - you could share a 7cM segment with
a 10th cousin, but no detectable DNA with a 5th cousin.
You and your 5th cousin
shares the same great-great-great-great grandparents. Now, I don't know about
you, but I certainly can't say who all of my 4G grandparents were - indeed, I
don't even know for sure who all my 3G grandparents were. I've got several
'brick walls' in the last 5 generations - and most researchers, including my
DNA cousins, are probably in the same situation. Go back another generation and
there are even more gaps - and it just gets worse from then on.
In other words, most of the
ancestors that link us to our DNA cousins are on the other side of a 'brick
wall' - and this could be a 'brick wall' in your own tree, in your cousin's
tree, or even in both trees. What a challenge!
The reward
At this stage it's important
to remind ourselves why we took a DNA
test! Surely the primary reason we tested was to knock down 'brick walls' that
conventional research couldn't breach? If our 'brick walls' have resisted our
efforts for years (or even decades), the opportunity to knock them down using
DNA is surely well worth grasping - even though it will mean that we have to
adopt a new and unfamiliar strategy, and utilise somewhat different techniques?
Before you get your results
Make sure that you've done
all the conventional, records-based, research you possibly can.
Complete your My Ancestors page, ensuring that you
have entered ALL of the cousins (no matter how distant) that you can find on
the 1881 Census. Yes, it might take you an hour or two, but skipping this
important step could cost your tens or even hundreds of hours when you come to
analyse your DNA matches.
Tip: start in 1841 and trace each of your branches (sometimes
referred to as collateral lines) through to 1881.
Remember, DNA testing isn't a
substitute for records-based research - you need to do both to have a reasonable
chance of success. Each builds on the other - if you only do one you're almost
certainly going to fail.
How to process your DNA matches
I'm going to assume for the
purpose of this article that you tested with Ancestry - but don't stop reading
if you tested elsewhere because I'll be covering techniques you can use, though
not as effectively, at Family Tree DNA and GEDmatch.
At Ancestry you'll typically
have 10000 to 20000 matches with cousins, and of those all but about 1% will be
with 'distant' cousins, ie where the estimated relationship is 5th cousin or
more distant. So you might think that the best strategy might be to focus on
the 1% on the basis that if you can't make head or tail of those matches, your
chance of resolving the more distant matches is negligible. Wrong, totally
wrong!!!
Here's how you should go
about it:
Strategy 1: search by surname
My experience has shown that
a much better approach is to search the trees of your matches by surname, in
the hope of identifying cousins who have the same surname in their tree as one
of your 'brick wall' ancestors. Here's how to go about it:
Strategy 2: search by birthplace
As you will have discovered
when working through your list of surnames, most of the time the surname of the
ancestors you share with a DNA cousin doesn't appear in both trees - indeed,
it's quite possible that the surname of your common ancestor doesn't appear in
either tree!
The problem is, when your
female ancestors married they generally took their husband's surname. This
makes it more difficult to research female ancestors whose children were born
before the commencement of civil registration, since baptism registers don't
usually give the mother's maiden surname - usually the only solution is to find
the marriage. (By contrast you can continue researching your male ancestors
even if you can't their marriage.)
Of course, this problem
doesn't simply affect you and your research - it affects your cousins too; most
researchers' trees become increasingly sparse with each generation. If you've
only identified 10% of your 256 6G grandparents and your cousins have only
identified 10% of theirs, the odds of finding out how you're related to a 7th
cousin simply by comparing the names in your trees are pretty remote.
Another way to figure out how
you are related to your DNA cousins is to look for geographical overlaps - and
here's how to go about it:
Strategy 3: look for overlaps with the
more unusual components of your ethnicity
Most readers of this
newsletter have mostly British, Irish, or western European ancestry. But some
of you will have Jewish ancestors, or ancestors from outside Europe, and whilst
ethnicity estimates can be quite misleading, they do provide another way of
analysing your matches.
Here's what Ancestry show for
one of my DNA cousins:
If Ancestry had detected a
Jewish component of my own ethnicity this would be one of the matches I'd be
looking at very closely.
Strategy 4: look for the 'elephant in
the room'
Because we all have 'brick
walls' in our trees there are parts of our ancestry that are a closed book -
yet there will inevitably be clues amongst our matches, if only we look for
them. For example, if - like me - you don't know of any Irish ancestors, but
have lots of matches with cousins who do, you might begin to wonder whether one
of your 'brick walls' is concealing a connection to Ireland.
I can't provide you with a step-by-step guide - it's all about
awareness (Louis Pasteur said that "chance favours the prepared
mind").
More tips
This article is about
confusion. I often employ homophones, words that sound similar but are spelled
differently, in the titles of articles in order to catch the eye and, hopefully,
encourage people to read the article that follows.
They sometimes backfire - in
the last issue I intentionally used the technical term 'phased' in a context
where it could have been read as 'fazed', prompting a flurry of emails from
readers who thought my spellchecker had misfired. I say 'readers', but in most
cases they hadn't gone on to read the article that followed, which is why they
didn't understand my play on words.
Homonyms are words that are
spelled and pronounced the same way, but have different meanings. So it's
arguably appropriate that the word 'homonym' should itself be used in a
somewhat different sense in this month's Significance
magazine. The authors of the article use it to refer to people who have the
same name - and there are few of us who have unique names if middle names are
ignored.
For example, you might think
that I have a rare name (I certainly did when I was young), but if you Google it
you'll find several other Peter Calvers, including a folk singer, a consultant,
a deceased racehorse trainer, a karate expert, and even a saint (well, I was
born on a Sunday - but actually it's a misspelling of 'Claver'). There are even
more in the Electoral Register, including one who lives in the same village as
me, though as far as I know we've never met.
The researchers analysed
voter lists for Paris and Marseille, enabling them to estimate that for the French
population as a whole, around 80% share both their first and last name with
somebody else - but because the number of forenames and surnames has increased
over the past century there would have been even fewer unique names in the
past. And as family historians know only too well, in earlier centuries most of
the population of England seem to have been called William, John, James,
Elizabeth, Ann, or Mary. This 2002 article shows (in Table 3) that
in every decade between 1570-1700 almost 50% of boys were christened with one
of the three most common forenames (the figure for girls was nearer 40%, but
still a substantial proportion).
When we're searching for the
baptisms of ancestors who died before the 1851 Census we usually start in the
parishes where they married, where their children were born, and where they
were buried - but when the only baptism we find is in another parish, we need
to look for confirmation that we've found the right parents. After all, it
might be the only baptism we can
find, but that doesn't mean there aren't others that we can't find - or which weren't recorded, or where the register
hasn't survived.
Some of the clues to look for
can be found in marriage registers, which might indicate that the person being
married is 'of' a certain parish (though that won’t always be the parish where
they were born); the names of witnesses can also be significant.
Check the burial register in
case your supposed ancestor died as an infant, as so many did. Look for
indications that a baptism entry might be missing - a gap of 3 or more years
between successive baptisms could be a clue. Wills, where they exist, can be
invaluable - and not just your ancestors' wills (I found a vital clue in the will
of one of my ancestor's brothers-in-law).
Tip: a forename or surname that is rare across Britain
as a whole can be common in a particular locality. For example, the boys' names
Roger and Nicholas are quite common in Devon, but they're rarely found in most
other parts of the country; similarly the girls' names Georgiana and Christiana
seem to turn up quite regularly in Cornwall.
Can anyone help Anne Harvey,
LostCousins member, and author with some information for her next book? I'll
let her explain:
I'm currently in the throes of editing the third of my
'Roberts' family saga set in the 1950s which you've kindly mentioned previously
in your newsletters. In it, one of my characters has developed epilepsy which
has all sorts of repercussions on the eventual outcome. In the course of my research,
I discovered that there was a common belief that anyone suffering from epilepsy
wasn't allowed to marry, a misconception that was even included on the World
Health Organisation website (which is where I found it). I wondered if any of
your readers had come across this situation or indeed any other
stigma/prejudice attached to epilepsy in the course of their family history. If
so, I would love to hear from them at lankyladyanne@gmail.com
Family history is so much
more than records and certificates - it's about people - so even when I read
the first book in the Anna Ames trilogy from Geraldine Wall I was immediately
won over!
A probate genealogist with a
heart and a complicated home life, Anna came over as a real person, so real
that it was if the author was writing from her own experience. And nobody can
have been sadder than me to read the last book in the trilogy, knowing that I
might never encounter Anna Ames again.
So I was absolutely delighted
when Geraldine Wall emailed me last month to let me know that there was a
fourth book out! File Under Fathers
has at its heart a murder, but it’s not a violent book, and our sympathies are
very much with the murderer. What starts out as a simple person-tracing
assignment becomes much, much more complex and our heroine gets finds herself
getting more closely involved than perhaps she should. But that's Anna Ames all
over - always thinking about others, but not always getting it quite right.
Like the rest of us!
Although you could read this
book on its own, it would be a great shame not to start with the first book of
the trilogy and work your way through, as there are bits of the storyline that
carry across from one book to the next. And I suspect that like me you'll start
to think of the characters as real - so you won’t to miss out.
File Under Fathers is highly recommended. Please note that although the books in this
series are only available in Kindle format you don't need a Kindle to read them
- I read them on my smartphone, and you can also get a free Kindle reader for
your computer or tablet.
You can support LostCousins
when you use the links below, even if you end up buying something else:
Amazon.co.uk - Amazon.com - Amazon.ca
Review: Marjorie - Too Afraid to Cry
In 1986, Margaret Humphreys,
a social worker in Nottingham, received a letter from a woman who claimed that
at the age of 4 she had been shipped to a Children's Home in Australia, and now
wanted help to find her parents or relatives in Britain.
The scandal of Britain's Home
Children, more than 100,000 of whom were sent to Australia, Canada, New
Zealand, Rhodesia, and South Africa in the 19th and 20th centuries (some as
recently as 1970) really only came to light during the investigation which followed
that letter, and led to the setting up of the Child Migrants Trust.
LostCousins member Patricia
Skidmore is the daughter of one of those children - her mother, Marjorie, was
one of 329 children to be sent to the Prince of Wales Fairbridge Farm School on
Vancouver Island between 1935-48. In February 2010 they travelled to England,
where they and other representatives of the migrants were personally greeted by
Gordon Brown, the British Prime Minister, and offered a heartfelt apology for
the wrongs that were done to them, and to their families.
Marjorie - Too Afraid to Cry is based on Marjorie's recollections, as told to her
daughter. It includes contemporary documents to support the story, many of them
from the files of the charity that treated the children so uncharitably. The
conversations in the book clearly can't be verbatim, but this is only to be
expected - this is a story that needed to be told.
The book is available as a paperback,
but it’s much cheaper on Kindle (which is how I read it). You can support
LostCousins using the following links:
Amazon.co.uk - Amazon.com - Amazon.ca
Review: The Vanished Child ONLY 99P UNTIL MONDAY
The latest book in the Jayne
Sinclair series from MJ Lee covers much of the same ground as Patricia
Skidmore's book, but whilst grounded in fact, the story itself is fiction. And
whereas Marjorie ended up in Canada, Harry gets sent to Australia, though the
treatment is equally harsh.
This time Jayne isn't working
for a paying client - she's helping her father's new wife to discover whether
the story her mother told her before she died is true. Does she really have a
half-brother who was adopted and, if so, can Jayne track him down 65 years
latter - even assuming he's still alive?
En route Jayne stops by the LostCousins
site - a smart move, even if I do say it myself. But on this occasion it's the
assistance she gets from a genealogist in Australia that helps to break the
back of the case, together with our heroine's usual doggedness and inspiration!
At just 99p until 26th
February this Kindle book is a real bargain - after that the price goes up to a
more normal £2.99, so don’t delay!!!
Amazon.co.uk - Amazon.com - Amazon.ca
Note: I could really relate to this story - before my
grandmother died she told my aunt about a child that my grandfather had
supposedly fathered before he married my grandmother. I'm hoping that one day
DNA testing will lead me to his or her descendants…..
In the last newsletter I
pointed out how I was nearly 2 months ahead of Lloyds Bank in recognising where
the fall-out from a Bitcoin crash might land, but 2 months is nothing compared
to the delay in this bank story…..
On 12th February 2003 I wrote
to Abbey National Mortgage Service pointing out that as our house was
registered at the Land Registry they no longer needed to hold our deeds, and
requesting that they made arrangements to return them. I provided a telephone
number in case of any queries but I got no reply whatsoever - not a peep. Nor
did they respond to the reminder I sent the following month.
Last week, completely
unannounced, the deeds to our house arrived in the post - 15 years almost to
the day since my original enquiry! The accompanying note from Santander (who
took over Abbey National in 2004) included the following:
It took them 15 years to
figure out that what I had told them in 2003 was correct - that they no longer
needed to hold onto our deeds. No doubt some of you have also received
unexpected packages from Santander recently - we can't be the only ones.
.
Note: I wrote asking for our title deeds because
concerns had been raised in the press about some lenders destroying these historic
documents because, following the change in the law, they were no longer of any
value to them; I must have thought it was pretty important at the time
because I wrote the letter two days before my wedding!
I've just bought
a new microSD card for my phone - for just £27.99 including shipping I got 128GB,
which is over 15 million times as much memory as in my first desktop computer,
all in a card that's smaller than the nail on my little finger! Even more
shocking was the sudden realisation that it's 40 years, bar a few months, since
I bought my 8k Commodore PET with its cassette tape storage. Doesn't time fly?
Philomena is being shown again
on BBC2 on Saturday 24th - an excellent film about a mother looking for her adopted son (and it's true).
Peter Calver
Founder,
LostCousins
© Copyright 2018
Peter Calver
Please do NOT copy or
republish any part of this newsletter without permission - which is only
granted in the most exceptional circumstances. However,
you MAY link to this newsletter or any article in it without asking for
permission - though why not invite other family historians to join LostCousins
instead, since standard membership (which includes the newsletter), is FREE?