Newsletter 29th
April 2021
LostCousins will be 17 years old on Saturday!
Help celebrate our birthday ENDS TUESDAY
Free access to British
censuses at Findmypast ENDS MONDAY
Over 50,000 corrected
surnames FREE TO MEMBERS
Good news about the
England & Wales censuses EXCLUSIVE
Help with the census
what local authority staff were told
Foundling archives to
be transcribed
The pros and cons of
transcription projects
The accuracy of
Wikipedia depends on you!
Root and branch
transformation?
Save on Who Do You
Think You Are? magazine EXCLUSIVE
Mother's Day DNA sale
in Australia & New Zealand
A happy memory in the
Radio Times
The Royal Commission on Tuberculosis
The LostCousins
newsletter is usually published 2 or 3 times a month. To access the previous issue
(dated 19th April) click here; to find earlier articles use the customised Google search between
this paragraph and the next (it searches ALL of the newsletters since February
2009, so you don't need to keep copies):
To go to the main
LostCousins website click the logo at the top of this newsletter. If you're not already a member, do join - it's FREE, and you'll
get an email to alert you whenever there's a new edition of this newsletter
available!
LostCousins will be 17 years old on Saturday!
Not only do I know precisely where I was and what
I was doing when I heard about the assassination of President Kennedy, and the
deaths of Princess Diana and the Duke of Edinburgh, I also know precisely wheren I
was on the day that the LostCousins website launched.
On 1st May 2004 I was standing outside the Royal
Horticultural Halls in Westminster, handing out leaflets to the queues of
people waiting to enter for the Society of Genealogists Annual Fair. I suspect
quite a few of you were also there although I remember only too well that only
a handful joined on that first day, despite the many hundreds of leaflets I doled
out as I trudged backwards and forwards along the queue.
But whilst I may have been going backwards and
forwards on the first day, it has been full steam ahead ever since around 120,000
people have joined over the years, and most are still members, though in some
cases we've lost contact. Nevertheless
there are 70,000 members who have received this issue of the newsletter, probably
the highest circulation of any independent genealogy newsletter in the world!
Help celebrate our birthday ENDS TUESDAY
From now until midnight on Tuesday 4th May the
LostCousins site will be completely free, allowing ALL members to initiate contact
with the relatives they've found. Whether your 'lost
cousin' replies before the deadline doesnt matter
it's when you send the invitation that counts.
Now's the time to add to the entries on your My Ancestors page every single
entry is a potential link to a 'lost cousin', but entries from the 1881 Census
are the most likely (by far) to match with your cousins' entries.
As many as three out of every four readers of this
newsletter are currently missing out because they haven't added anyone to their
My Ancestors page, or have only entered a small subset of their relatives are you
one of them? Whilst it's their prerogative to turn down the opportunity, I
wonder if they've seriously considered how it affects
their own cousins? LostCousins is all about cousins helping each other so I sincerely
hope that everyone reading this will play their part.
Free access to British censuses at Findmypast ENDS MONDAY
From 10am (London time) on Friday 30th April until
10am on Monday 3rd May, Findmypast are offering free access to ALL of their British censuses from 1841-1911, and for
LostCousins members it's a great opportunity to find more relatives to add to
your My Ancestors page.
Please choose the link for the Findmypast site you prefer:
Searching the censuses at Findmypast is different
from searching them at most other sites for a start, you can search by
address as well as by name. And most censuses can be searched by occupation,
which can be very handy when you're looking for
someone with a common surname, but a more unusual profession.
Note: the censuses
which can't be searched by occupation are the 1841 and
1871 England & Wales censuses, which weren't transcribed by Findmypast
themselves.
To get the best out of Findmypast it's almost always best to search individual record sets
separately. For example, if you want to search by occupation
you can only do so across all of the censuses by entering the occupation as a
keyword, which could lead to the search results you want being overwhelmed by others
which are irrelevant, whether youre looking for the Bakers who were smiths, or
the Smiths who were bakers.
Tip: for more advice
on searching at Findmypast please see this Masterclass.
Finally, a reminder that the 1939 Register wasn't actually a census, though it did use the infrastructure
created for the 1941 Census (which, of course, never happened). So the 1939 Register
is not included in this weekend's free access offer which is a shame because
Findmypast have the most complete version of the register (just last week they
opened up another 95,000 records search all of their 34,943,465 entries here).
Over 50,000 corrected surnames FREE TO
MEMBERS
Have you ever struggled to find a relative on the
census, only to discover that their surname had been recorded incorrectly, or mistranscribed? Smart searching using wildcards can bypass
many of the potential problems, but sometimes we feel like giving up. Fortunately there's help at hand!
Since LostCousins began in 2004 members have been contributing
to the Index of Incorrect Surnames, a fully-searchable resource that can help you find your relatives in
the censuses that we use and I'm delighted to say
that following the latest update there are now more than 50,000 surnames in the
list.
How does it work? As you know, the LostCousins
matching system utilises the data from the census, whether it's
right or wrong but members can choose to add corrections in the optional part
of the form (these appear on your My Ancestors page in italics, as reminder that the census shows something different).
Whilst this information isn't
employed in the matching process, any corrected surnames you enter will be
added to the Index of Incorrect
Surnames to make it easier for others some of whom will
be your cousins to find the same entries. For example, my CALVER relatives appear in the censuses under multiple
spellings, and by typing CALVER into the search box I can list those that have
been spotted by LostCousins members:
Usually the most difficult census entries to find are the ones where the
surname shown is completely different from the one you expect this can happen,
for example, when a widow remarries and her children are shown on the census
under their stepfather's surname, or where a child is staying with an aunt or
grandmother. Enumerators loved using ditto marks!
Finally, it's worth mentioning that although the
index only includes information from the censuses we
use at LostCousins, if you're struggling to find some of your relatives in a
different census it might still be worth trying some of the alternatives listed.
Note: the Index of Incorrect Surnames is only available to LostCousins
members, so you'll need to log-in first. If you can't remember your log-in details click the Password reminder link and enter the email
address quoted in the text of the email you received telling you about this
newsletter.
Good news about the England & Wales censuses EXCLUSIVE
In 2021 a number of family
historians added additional information when filling in their paper census forms,
so I decided to use the Freedom of Information Act to find out from the Office
for National Statistics whether this information would be available to future
generations when the censuses are eventually published.
This is what they told me:
"Digital image
scans will be made of the entire forms which will enable descendants to see the
additional information when the forms are released to the public. After scanning
all questionnaires are held in a secure warehouse pending the acceptance of the
data. Once approved, all questionnaires are securely shredded by a company
authorised to handle sensitive paper waste and the shredded paper is sent to a
paper mill to be recycled."
I also asked about censuses from 1951-2011:
"The household
schedules from 1951 -2001 have been securely retained. The forms from 2011 were
scanned in their entirety."
In both 2011 and 2021 I completed the census online
I wish now that I had used the paper form, as I know many of you did!
If
you live in England or Wales you'll know when Census
Day was it was Sunday 21st March. But the householder is expected to complete
the census form based on who was living in the household on Census Night so is
that the night of Saturday 20th to Sunday 21st March, which would seem logical
since we're expected to complete the form on Census
Day? Or is it the night of Sunday 21st to Monday 22nd March?
It
might seem a moot point, but as around 1500 people will have sadly passed away
on Census Day (and about 1750 babies will have been born), thousands of
household returns depend upon it. And that's ignoring
the people who moved home or left home on Census Day I don't suppose many
house purchases are completed on a Sunday, but people moving from one rented property
to another might well choose to do so at the weekend.
The Census
(England and Wales) Order 2020 provides the answer:
Now
that the majority of people complete the census online
it seems following official advice and completing the census on or before
Census Day is risky you can't go back and amend a return once it has been
submitted. Of course, some life events are more predictable than others.
Help
with the census what local authority staff were told
When
I was researching the previous article I came across a leaflet
that was produced to help local authority employees answer questions from
members of the public it's worth downloading a copy for your family history
archive as there's no guarantee it will remain available for ever.
Red tape strikes again
Downloading
official documents while you can is always a good idea
you never know what's going to happen to them. Some of you will recall that 2
years ago I set up the website 2021Census.com
where you could download copies of the form used in the 2019 rehearsal for the
2021 England & Wales census. I'm a great believer
in making public information available to the public.
Sadly the UK Government have forced me to remove
those PDF files from my website, and they are not available anywhere else at
this time; however I've found an online source of the draft returns published
in 2020, and I've substituted a link to those.
Note:
some people might think that the Government are a bit miffed that I registered
the domain name 2021Census.com before they thought of doing it themselves. If
so, then goodness knows what they'll do when they
discover that I also own the domain name 2031census.com!
Foundling archives to be transcribed
Earlier
this month I mentioned
the Foundling Hospital, the brainchild of Thomas Coram, but what I didn't know
at the time is that the charity has embarked on a project to transcribe 112,000
pages from their archive which cover the period 1739-1910, According to their
website:
If
you would like to volunteer your services follow this link
all you need is a computer and some spare time.
The pros and cons of transcription projects
Transcribing
old handwriting - especially if it has been scratched on vellum with a quill
pen using ink that has faded or become smudged - is a challenging task, whether
the work is carried out by volunteers or paid transcribers. I take my hat off
to them anyone who dares to criticise their work gets short shrift from me!
I'd encourage anyone who has spare time,
patience, and good eyesight to take on the challenge, but please bear in mind
that engaging in a transcription project isnt necessarily the best way of
helping others. For example, I would argue that collaborating with family
historians who are our cousins should generally take priority the fact that we're researching the same ancestral lines means that we
each have something special to offer to the other.
The accuracy of Wikipedia depends on you!
Another
collaborative project is Wikipedia, an encyclopaedia written and edited by
volunteers I find it an excellent place to start my research on a topic
that's new to me, or one
where I need to refresh my knowledge (or check facts such as names and dates
when writing an article of my own).
Sadly there are some people including a few LostCousins
members who think that Wikipedia is such an unreliable source that it isnt worthy
of consideration. There are over 6 million articles in English, far more than
in any printed encyclopaedia, or indeed any other online encyclopedia
(see this table)
so there are bound to be some errors, just as there are in any encyclopaedia.
But
what annoys me most is the people who criticise the work of other volunteers,
but don't bother to correct the errors that they find.
All publications depend on their readers to point out mistakes that have slipped
past the editorial team, and readers who carp without contributing corrections
are simply being negative. Anyone can edit a Wikipedia page, so the next time you
find an error, how about doing the right thing?
Root and branch transformation?
I
realised only recently that some family historians are confused about what is meant
when we refer to a branch of a family tree - it probably doesn't help that family trees are normally drawn with the roots
going upwards and the branches going downwards. So perhaps I shouldn't
have been surprised to discover that when some people talk about branches,
they're actually talking about ancestral lines.
When
I talk about the branches of my tree, what I mean is the parts of the
tree that are not in my direct line because they branch off from one
of the main lines, to use a railway analogy. Like most family historians I dont put as much effort into researching individual
branches as I do into researching my roots (though because there are so many
branches they probably take more of my time).
Nevertheless branches are important, because they're
where ALL of our cousins are to be found as anyone who has tested their DNA
will have discovered. From your point of view each of your cousins is connected
to your tree by a branch, though for them its the other
way round your branch is their direct line, and the point at which their
direct line diverges from yours is where your branch begins.
For
LostCousins members (and if you received an email from me telling you about this
newsletter you're one of us), branches are where our
'lost cousins' will be found. That's why when you're
completing your My Ancestors page it's so important to enter relatives
from the branches of your tree.
Note:
a good strategy to maximise your chances of connecting with 'lost cousins' is
to start in 1841 and track each branch and twig through to 1881.
Save on Who Do You Think You Are?
magazine EXCLUSIVE
If
youre in the UK you can get 6 issues for just £9.99,
less than you would normally pay for just 2 issues at the newsagent, whilst
members overseas can make really BIG savings on annual subscriptions (at least
50%). Please follow this link.
Note:
if you are in Canada the price quoted will be in US dollars (you'll
pay the same price as your friends across the border); similarly, if you are in
New Zealand the price quoted will be in Australian dollars.
Mother's Day DNA sale in Australia & New
Zealand
Until
Sunday 9th May residents of Australia and New Zealand can save $30 on Ancestry
DNA tests, which are reduced from $129 to $99 (excluding shipping, prices are
in Australian dollars).
To
support LostCousins when you make your purchase please
follow the link below (if youre logged-in to Ancestry, please log-out and
click the link a second time):
Ancestry.com.au
SAVE $30 on DNA tests until 9th May
Tip:
if you can't see the link its because you're using an
adblocking program or browser extension; I suggest you make LostCousins.com an
exception. Please also make sure that tracking is enabled (more information here).
For
once these adoption stories don't involve LostCousins
members, but nonetheless I thought you'd like to read them.
The
first concerns a teenage relationship that produces a child, who is given up
for adoption then 53 years later the couple meet up, get married, and embark
on a quest to find their 'lost' daughter. You can read all about this
heart-warming story here.
The
second came from an episode of The Repair Shop that I watched this week.
It was a lovely story about photographs that had been found in old handbag it
was the first time that 82 year-old Derek had seen his
mother since she died in 1938, when he was just 2 years old. This newspaper article
includes a clip from the programme.
Last
week I received a lovely email from LostCousins member Elaine, who wrote:
"I
have just read your latest newsletter and can relate to
the 60 year old postcard story.
"I
was recently going through my mother's photographs again and found photos of
her penfriend from England. They corresponded sometime during the period 1947
to 1952. My mother often mentioned her penfriend.
"I
decided to go searching through Ancestry's Public Member's Trees, to see if I could find anyone
connected with this lady. I had some idea of her address as there were two
postcards which indicated this.
"I
sent a message to two people who I thought might be possible relatives. One
fellow replied and
I have now sent copies of the photographs which I have. The lady did marry the
man who was her boyfriend pictured in one of the photographs.
"I
was very pleased to make this connection."
On
Saturday when I wrote to Elaine to thank her for the photographs
she'd sent me, she mentioned that she'd just been listening to a programme on
the radio about a man going through his late mother's belongings who found the
letters which his Mum and Dad wrote during his Dad's service in WW2. I didnt hear the programme, but it instantly reminded me of
the hundreds of letters that my father sent home to his mother during the war, many
of which I've yet to read.
I
also remembered that after my step-mother died in 2003
I briefly attempted to track down the girl that my father had been sweet on
before the war but who, by the time he was demobbed, had married a Canadian
serviceman and crossed the Atlantic with him.
A happy memory in the Radio Times
In
the last issue I mentioned
that historic copies of the Radio Times are available free online which
had a big impact on one member. Here's what Ann wrote:
"I
have just read your latest newsletter which as usual is full of helpful info
and interesting things to enjoy.
"One
little sentence caught my eye, about copies of old Radio Times being
available, so I clicked on the link and within five minutes was taken back to
11th September 1954 Children's Hour. What an age of innocent and
simple entertainment it was compared to today: my friend and I aged 16 and 15 played
piano duets on that programme for five minutes and were each paid one guinea
and sent a contract for that performance.
"For
some reason I didnt keep, or have lost, a copy of the
Radio Times for that day, so to find it and be able to print off the
cover and our programme has really made my day. We played 'out' quite a lot at
various functions, but both followed the conventional path of work, marriage and a family, not a piano playing career.
"Thank
you so much for this most unexpected find Im sending my friend (yes, she is
still alive and well) a copy of what Ive found and I
know she will be delighted."
The
Royal Commission on Tuberculosis
My
father suffered from tuberculosis in his teens, but thankfully survived however
his elder brother Horace, who had been hospitalised with TB between 1928-30 but
recovered, succumbed to a second bout in 1936. It's
sobering to think that I was the first of my grandfather's descendants not to
suffer from TB fortunately I got the BCG vaccination as a child.
At
the beginning of the 20th century the origins of TB were still being hotly-debated. In 1901, at the International
Congress on Tuberculosis in London, Robert Koch the scientist who had discovered
the bacterium that causes TB stated that in his view the chance of the
disease being transmitted from cattle to humans via milk was very low, but many
scientists didn't agree, and a Royal Commission was set up.
Sir
James Blyth, owner of Blythwood Farm in Stansted
Mountfitchet (the village where LostCousins was to be founded a century later),
had been the treasurer of the 1901 Congress. He offered the free use of his farm
for research purposes and this turned out to be crucial, as you can see from the
first page of this article
from the British Medical Journal in 1911.
Note:
if you want to research this topic further the paper 'Milk consumption and
tuberculosis in Britain, 1850-1950' provides some interesting background it is
free to read and download.
This is where any major updates and corrections will be
highlighted - if you think you've spotted an error
first reload the newsletter (press Ctrl-F5) then check again before writing to me, in case someone else has
beaten you to it......
Peter Calver
Founder, LostCousins
© Copyright 2021 Peter Calver
Please do NOT copy or republish any part of this newsletter
without permission - which is only granted in the most exceptional
circumstances. However,
you MAY link to this newsletter or any article in it without asking for
permission - though why not invite other family historians to join LostCousins
instead, since standard membership (which includes the newsletter), is FREE? To
link to a specific article right-click on the article name in the contents list
at the top of the newsletter.