Newsletter - 18th April 2019

 

 

LostCousins is completely free for Easter ENDS WEDNESDAY

Why search for cousins?

Win an Ancestry test for yourself or your British cousin EXCLUSIVE

Last year's competition winner is very happy!

Success story: lost and foundling

Woman with her organs in the wrong place lives to 99

Colourising old photos

What am I reading?

Stop Press

 

 

The LostCousins newsletter is usually published 2 or 3 times a month. To access the previous issue (13th April) click here; to find earlier articles use the customised Google search between this paragraph and the next (it searches ALL of the newsletters since February 2009, so you don't need to keep copies):

 

 

To go to the main LostCousins website click the logo at the top of this newsletter. If you're not already a member, do join - it's FREE, and you'll get an email to alert you whenever there's a new edition of this newsletter available!

 

 

LostCousins is completely free for Easter ENDS WEDNESDAY

Nobody has to pay to find their 'lost cousins'. Almost all of the censuses we use (including at least one from each country) are free online, and each year there are several periods when the LostCousins site is completely free, which means that all members can contact the cousins they've been matched with.

 

It's easier to find cousins than you might think - when you enter a relative from the England & Wales 1881 census on your My Ancestors page there's 1 chance in 15 of an IMMEDIATE MATCH. This means that most new members would be able to find at least one 'lost cousin' on the day they join!

 

Of course, there are many members who don't complete their My Ancestors page on the day they join. That's fine, of course, so long as they don’t keep kicking the can down the road. Unbelievably there are some people who've been members for over 10 years but still haven't found a spare half hour to help their own cousins.... let's hope they read this article and put matters right!

 

 

Why search for cousins?

Nobody can research their entire family tree on their own - so connecting with others who share your ancestors is a great way to achieve far more than you possibly could on your own. And most people have inherited photographs, correspondence, medals, or other items that have little intrinsic value but would mean a lot to a relative - you won’t find everything online or in record office.

 

Of course, there are many ways to search for cousins, but when you find them in the phone book or the electoral register there's nothing to tell you whether or not they know anything about their family tree, so most of the time you’re going to be disappointed. You need a thick skin and a lot of confidence to go down that route!

 

It's the same with DNA - you'll be matched with tens of thousands of genetic cousins, but most of them won’t have a tree, and even when they do, the chances that there are common ancestors who appear in both trees is very small indeed (typically around 1 in 1000). So most of the time you can't be sure whether they're really cousins or how they're related.

 

By contrast, finding a 'lost cousin' - someone you know to be researching their family tree, and - whose connection to you is documented - is like gold dust. Yes, there's still a small chance that they won’t reply (usually because they've changed their email address), but in that case you have me to act as a helper or intermediary.

 

Incidentally, if you have tested your DNA then finding a 'lost cousin' who has already tested (as many LostCousins members have) will make it easier for you to make sense of your DNA matches - see this article from last month. And even if your cousins haven't tested, it'll be much easier to persuade a fellow reader of this newsletter to test than someone who doesn’t share your interest in genealogy!

 

 

Win an Ancestry test for yourself or your British cousin EXCLUSIVE

Wednesday 1st May will be the 15th Birthday of LostCousins, and to celebrate this achievement I'm giving away an Ancestry DNA test. I purchased it from Ancestry.co.uk, so it can only be used by someone in the UK - but since every LostCousins member either lives in the UK, or has cousins here, I hope you'll all take part in my competition.

 

Every direct ancestor or blood relative you enter on your My Ancestors page between 13th April and midnight (London time) on Tuesday 30th April 2019 represents an entry in the competition, and for each one you enter from the 1881 Census you'll get a bonus entry.

 

Tip: a 'direct ancestor' is someone from whom you are descended, such as a great-great grandparent - most people just call them ancestors; a 'blood relative' is a cousin, ie someone who shares your ancestry.

 

If the winner lives outside the UK they'll be invited to nominate a relative in the UK to receive the prize - and even if you live in the UK you can do the same (if you have already tested). Arranging for a cousin to test is a great way to maximise the value of your own DNA test.

 

 

Last year's competition winner is very happy!

Some of you will recall that Muriel won a DNA test in my competition last year - and as there's another test up for grabs in our 15th Birthday Competition she thought that you might be inspired to enter by hearing how successful she's been:

 

"I hope this year's winner has as much enjoyment out of it as I have had, and what with getting another test for my husband, it has been quite a memorable year. We too have found more cousins in far away places and with connections back several generations, showing what a powerful tool DNA can be - and that our data is sound.

 

"I have not found the connection where several of our matches show up on both our DNA results.

 

[Muriel is referring to matches that she shares with her husband - this could indicate that he and she are distant cousins, but that's not the only possible explanation.]

 

"I was interested to find how many of my relatives had gone to live abroad as I thought my lot were firmly rooted in the south of England.... We have also managed to solve a family mystery on my husband's side, something we had not hoped to do before DNA testing."

 

 

Success story: lost and foundling

If you watched the TV programme about foundlings earlier this year you'll be heartened to read this wonderful story from a LostCousins member who I've been corresponding with over many years:

 

"In November 1918 a baby girl was found on the streets of London; there was no evidence of who her parents were. She was taken into the nearby workhouse infirmary, where she was assessed as being about 4 months old. Staff gave her the name Florence.

 

"Florence eventually had children and grandchildren of her own. One of her grandchildren decided to see if she could find out more about where Florence came from, and she and two of Florence’s children took DNA tests. These revealed a strong (probably 3rd cousin level) match with one of my 2nd cousins, as well as matches with other relatives of my 2nd cousins. This enabled us to see who the common ancestor was, a man born in Norfolk in 1822 who moved to London in the mid 1800s.

 

"We drew up a tree of all his descendants, and used the details to assess who might be a candidate for one of Florence’s parents (at this point we didn’t know if it was the father or mother that we were looking for on this line).  We divided people into 3 categories: impossible (dead, too old, too young, already married before 1918 etc), strong (aged around 15 to 40 in 1918), or in-between.  Initially there were about a dozen names on our strong list.

 

"We then looked for living descendants using BMD indexes, electoral registers, wills, phone books and social media sites. Our aim was to get more people to take a DNA test so that we could use the strength of the matches to narrow down the possibilities. We contacted several; some of them did not reply, but a couple of DNA results helped us to reduce the number of strong candidates and to exclude some of the others. But we needed a stronger match.

 

"We had already established that there was no birth record of a baby with the right surname being born out of wedlock at the right time in the right area of London. But it then occurred to us that if Florence was about 4 months old when she was abandoned, there ought to be a birth record for her. So we looked for any girl born in mid-1918 to a descendant of the known common ancestor.

 

"There was only one such record in the right area of London. This child had been born in June to a married couple who had already had 3 children and had another in 1920. We had originally put the mother in our impossible list! But a check on the child turned up no further record of her between 1918 and 2017 - no death, no marriage, no appearance in the 1939 Register (even just searching on her birth date).  And interestingly, the child’s forename was used as the second name of the child born in 1920.  Was that in memory of the abandoned child?  Could she be our Florence?

 

"Fortunately we were able to find the war record of the father; this suggested (but not conclusively) that he was away on service at the times the child would have been both conceived and born. So we looked for living descendants of the couples’ other children, and one (a son of the child born in 1920) agreed to take a DNA test. The strength of his match to Florence’s children indicated that he was almost certainly their half 1st cousin. We had surely found both Florence and Florence’s mother - so much for thinking that the impossible was impossible! Presumably the mother had abandoned the child in fear of the reaction of her husband when he returned from the war following the Armistice.

 

"We are now looking for Florence’s father. The original DNA results had indicated strong links to a second family, so we have gone through the same process as for the mother. Interestingly several descendants on this line were living within a stone’s throw of Florence’s mother in the period 1911-1918. We are also using an online tool that allows us to hypothesise where in a tree an individual fits and calculates the relative probabilities of the hypotheses, based on the strength of DNA matches. We now need just one strong DNA match."

 

Until recently it would have been impossible to work out who Florence's parents were - now her mother has been identified, and the list of possible candidates for the father has been whittled down to just two. All it took was determination, hard work, and DNA!

 

Note: I heard the first part of this wonderful story last year - and the question I asked my correspondent then was very simple, but absolutely crucial. Can you guess what it was?

 

 

Woman with her organs in the wrong place lives to 99

This story on the BBC website was fascinating - I wonder how many of us have undetected conditions of this type?

 

 

Colourising old photos

I don't usually write about a website before I've had a chance to try it out myself, but this Singapore-based site comes highly recommended by the LostCousins member who discovered it - and it’s free!

 

Follow this link to try it out yourself - and let me know what you think.

 

Note: since the newsletter was published I've been absolutely overwhelmed with positive feedback about this site - there is no need to contact me, just enjoy seeing your ancestors as you have never seen the before! And instead of passing on a direct link to your friends, please give them a link to this article so they can appreciate what else LostCousins offers.

 

 

What am I reading?

Much as I enjoy reading genealogical fiction, I also have the duty to identify books that are going to help you research your tree, or understand the world in which your ancestors lived.

 

I don't know how many of you have ordered the books on cohabitation that I reviewed in the last issue, but they are such important contributions to English family history that, even though they were published a few years ago, I felt they shouldn’t be ignored. Professor Probert's book is the more comprehensive, and the more accurate of the two, but they are both enlightening in their own way.

 

Books on the use of DNA by genealogists are not as common as one might expect, given the surge in popularity of the tests themselves - but perhaps that's because you don’t need to know what's under the bonnet in order to drive a car. When I first started taking DNA tests I read anything and everything that was published, but nowadays DNA providers like Ancestry insulate users from the nuts and bolts.

 

Nevertheless, when I heard that my favourite DNA guru, Debbie Kennett, had contributed a chapter to Advanced Genetic Genealogy: Techniques and Case Studies I knew it would be worth reading... and with nearly 400 large format pages to get through I suspect I'll be reading it for some time to come!

 

If you can’t wait for my review please use the links below when you place your order:

 

Amazon.co.uk                    Amazon.com                     Amazon.ca              The Book Depository

 

 

Stop Press

This is where any major updates and corrections will be highlighted - if you think you've spotted an error first reload the newsletter (press Ctrl-F5) then check again before writing to me, in case someone else has beaten you to it......

 

 

Description: Description: peter_signature

 

Peter Calver

Founder, LostCousins

 

© Copyright 2019 Peter Calver

 

Please do NOT copy or republish any part of this newsletter without permission - which is only granted in the most exceptional circumstances. However, you MAY link to this newsletter or any article in it without asking for permission - though why not invite other family historians to join LostCousins instead, since standard membership (which includes the newsletter), is FREE?