Newsletter
- 24th September 2013
Ancestry.co.uk - shock price increases BREAKING NEWS
2021 Census consultation launches
Did
your ancestor work in the Royal Household?
GRO:
Royal Commission agrees with us
Why
won't the GRO update their indexes?
Suffragettes
and the 1911 Census
Last
chance to save at findmypast ENDS MONDAY
Ancestry
add Birmingham parish registers
Irish
newspapers online - nearly 2 million articles
You won’t
find Fido at findmypast
Interview: Gordon Honeycombe EXCLUSIVE
Genealogy
in the Sunshine: latest news
Can
you solve a calendar conundrum?
The LostCousins newsletter is
usually published fortnightly. To access the previous newsletter (dated 11
September 2013) click here, for an index to articles
from 2009-10 click here, for
a list of articles from 2011 click here and for a
list of articles from 2012-13 click here.
Whenever possible links are
included to the websites or articles mentioned in the newsletter (they are
highlighted in blue or purple and underlined,
so you can't miss them).For your convenience, when you click on a link a new
browser window or tab will open (so that you don’t lose your place in the newsletter)
- if nothing seems to happen then you need to enable pop-ups in your browser or
change the settings In your security software.
To go to the main LostCousins
website click the logo at the top of this newsletter. If you're not already a
member, do join - it's FREE, and you'll get an email to alert you whenever
there's a new edition of this newsletter available!
Ancestry.co.uk
- shock price increases BREAKING
NEWS
Just as I was finalising this newsletter
this morning I discovered that
Ancestry have considerably increased the cost of
subscriptions to their UK site. Whilst this is something that I've long feared
- subscriptions to Ancestry's overseas sites were far higher - it still came as
a most unwelcome shock.
The
most popular subscription, the Premium subscription, has gone up by NEARLY 40%
from £107.40 to £149 a year; the Worldwide
subscription has increased by 28%, from £155.40 to £199.
It's several years since Ancestry changed their prices,
during which time they've added many new datasets - so it's possible to argue
that this increase has always been on the cards. However, so long as findmypast
hold their prices I suspect that they're going to pick up a lot of extra
subscribers (especially since there's a 10% discount until the end of the month
- see below for full details).
Note:
shortly after writing this article I visited the Ancestry.co.uk site again and
this time the old prices were displayed. Have they rescinded the increases due
to unfavourable reactions, or merely delayed them? Only time will tell.
2021 Census
consultation launches
The long-awaited consultation that will
finally decide the future of the England & Wales census has just been
published by the Office of National Statistics. I suggest you read through the consultation
document, but that you don't respond until I've had a chance to set out my
thoughts in this newsletter.
There's also a draft document
relating to the specific needs of genealogists and social researchers which you
might find useful, but again I haven't had a chance to study it myself yet.
Did your ancestor
work in the Royal Household?
Findmypast have added another 300,000
entries to their collection of Royal Household staff records, taking the total
to over 380,000 covering the period from 1526-1924. You'll find more details
and a link to the Search page here.
GRO: Royal Commission agrees with us
In October 1910 Winston Churchill signed
an order establishing a Royal Commission headed by a judge to "inquire
into and report on the state of the public records and local records of a
public nature".
In my last newsletter I mentioned some
of their comments relating to the General Register Office - and having now
obtained a copy of their Final Report from 1919 I'm able to reveal that they also
recommended:
"The
readjustment of the regulations of the General Register Office.... to enable
searchers to consult the original registers on payment of the usual inspections
fees"
In my letter to the Home Secretary
earlier this year I asserted that the Registrar General could make this change
simply by varying the regulations managing the GRO under section 5 of the 1836
Act. Clearly the Royal Commission were of the same opinion.
Aware that many of the searchers did not
need evidence for legal purposes, because they were researching family trees,
the Commission made a further recommendation (note that in this context
"remitted" means "waived"):
"Official
fees for the inspection or reproduction of literary documents in the Principal
Probate Registry and General Registry Office to be remitted or reduced as far
as possible"
94 years ago they could have had no idea
that computers and the Internet would transform the opportunities for ordinary
people to research their family trees, yet they came up with substantially the
same proposals that I have outlined in my newsletters. It clearly isn't rocket
science!
In the meantime I've learned that Sarah Rapson, the Registrar General for England & Wales, took
over in April as the head of the new UK Visas and Immigration Service, which has
assumed responsibility for immigration previously borne by the UK Border
Agency, which in 2006 was famously described by the then Home Secretary, John
Reid, as "not fit for purpose".
However Ms Rapson
retains her appointment as Registrar General, described in the 2012-13
Annual Report of the Identity & Passport Service as a "formal
position". Is she, or isn't she, in charge of the General Register Office
- and if not, who is? Perhaps it's time for another Freedom of Information
request - in which I'll also be asking about the figures in the Annual Report
which apparently show that the cost of issuing copy certificates has halved
(unlike the prices, of course). I suspect it's simply a change of presentation,
but if so you'd think that they might tell us, rather than keep us
guessing.....
Why won't the GRO
update their indexes?
I frequently get emails from members
complaining that although the GRO have agreed to update their records the
online GRO indexes haven't changed.
Unfortunately this is the GRO's standard
practice - they'll update their own records at their Southport offices, but
they don't notify people who have previously purchased (or otherwise acquired) copies
of the indexes - whether they're libraries with microfiche, or websites like
Ancestry, findmypast and FreeBMD which have digitised the indexes.
Over the years there must have been tens
(or even hundreds) of thousands of amendments that have been made. In some
cases you'll see the evidence of the earliest changes online - typically a
handwritten note at the bottom of a page.
Because the GRO's policy (with regard to
selling copies of the indexes) changed a few years ago there's little prospect
of them putting matters right in the foreseeable future.
Note:
in the GRO article in my last newsletter I asked whether you could figure out
why there so many people called Childers who apparently died in a single
quarter of 1943. The answer, as many of you figured out, is that there was an
indexing error - most of the deaths were actually of people named Childs (a
much more common surname). Incidentally, I was wrong to imply that the name
Childers name always derives from Schilders - in fact
it has been around since mediaeval times, and James's relatives were an
exception.
Suffragettes and
the 1911 Census
I recently came across a letter from Mrs
Pankhurst to the Editor of The Times
in which she explained why suffragettes would be boycotting the 1911 Census (it
was published on Monday 29th March 1911). However, although I was aware of the
boycott I hadn't seen any hard evidence - until Claire wrote to tell me about
Mrs Martin of Fulham.
The enumerator had written out the
return himself, naming the occupants as "Mrs Martin", "Mr
Martin", and "Servant" and adding the explanation "Details
refused Mrs Martin absolutely declining to see Enumerator, although called
several times & forbade her maid or son to disclose any particulars."
Note:
if you want to look up the entry yourself the references are
Piece 307, Schedule 74.
Last chance to save at
findmypast ENDS MONDAY
Until Monday 30th September you can save
10% on any new subscription to findmypast.co.uk when you click here
and use the code LCW10
But that's not all - you can also get a
free LostCousins subscription (worth up to £12.50) AND a much-coveted invitation
to join the new LostCousins forum before it opens officially (priceless - only
1% of members have been invited, so it really IS a privilege).
To make sure you qualify for the bonuses
follow these simple steps (and read the small print at the bottom, in case it
applies to you):
(1) Click here
to go the findmypast website (it will open in a new tab or browser window),
then either register or log-in. If you are already logged-in when you arrive at
the website (perhaps because you've been checking out the latest data releases
before subscribing) log-out, then start again by clicking the link at the
beginning of this paragraph.
If you aren't taken to the Subscribe page automatically, click Subscribe in the top right hand corner.
Note: if the Promotional Code box isn't
shown it's because you haven't logged in yet (there are two screens that look
very similar).
(2) Enter the exclusive offer code LCW10 in the Promotional Code box, and
click Apply to display the discounted offer prices:
(3) Choose the subscription that's best
for you, bearing in mind that 12 month subscriptions offer by far the best
value (because the second 6 months is virtually half price).
The World subscription includes Ireland, Australia & New
Zealand, and the USA plus a few records from other
countries (click on the country name to see precisely which records are
included).
If you're only interested in British
records (England, Scotland, and Wales) the Full subscription is by far the best
choice - the Foundation subscription only offers basic records and is for
absolute beginners (don't even consider it!). The wealth of additional datasets
you get with a Full subscription are well worth the small additional cost,
especially when you consider that a subscription to just one of them - the British
Newspaper collection - would cost £79.95 if purchased separately.
(4) Before entering your credit card
details make sure that the price shown is
the discounted price!
If at any stage during the process you
are logged out (this often happens to me while I'm looking for my credit card),
if your credit card isn't accepted for any reason, or if you have to switch to
a different browser or a different computer, please start again at step (1) to
ensure that you qualify for your free LostCousins subscription.
(5) When you receive your email receipt
from findmypast forward a copy to me so that I can verify your entitlement (you
won't find my email address on the website, but it is in the email I sent telling you about this newsletter). Your
free LostCousins subscription will run for 6 or 12 months and can include your
spouse or partner as well - just make sure that the two accounts are linked
together before you write to me (all you need to do is enter
the other person's membership number on your My Details page).
If you already have a LostCousins subscription I'll extend it.
Small print: these offers cannot be
combined with any other offers or discounts or backdated; if you are a current
findmypast subscriber you will receive a 10% Loyalty Discount when your
subscription is renewed automatically, so you won't qualify for either offer.
However if you upgrade your findmypast subscription before the renewal date you
should qualify for a free LostCousins subscription (provided you follow the instructions
above). Free LostCousins subscriptions are funded by the commission we receive
from findmypast, and that's why it's important you follow the instructions to
the letter - if you have any questions ask me before you
complete your purchase, because it will be too late afterwards!
Ancestry add
Birmingham parish registers
The Birmingham area is one of the most
difficult to research, so I was delighted when - as foreshadowed in my November
newsletter - Ancestry last week added parish registers for Birmingham and many
of its suburbs.
The following links will take you direct
to the relevant search pages (click Browse
this collection at the right of the page to see a list of parishes
included):
Baptisms,
Marriages, and Burials 1538-1812
Irish newspapers
online - nearly 2 million articles
Nearly 2 million articles from Irish
newspapers for the period 1820-1926 are now online at findmypast.ie
(but you can also access them at findmypast.co.uk
if you have a World subscription).
You won’t find Fido at
findmypast
Because the censuses prior to 1901 were
destroyed long ago other Irish records that have survived can be incredibly
useful, even if they might seem somewhat esoteric - or, in this case, barking
mad.
Findmypast.ie
have launched a new dataset with well over half a
million dog licence records from the period 1866-1913 (you can access them at findmypast.co.uk
if you have a World subscription). The records include the owner's name and
address but ironically the one piece of information missing from the dog
licence records is the name of the dog (though it does give the breed, gender,
and colour).
I'm told that millions more records will
be added to this dataset over the coming months - but it's only a ruff estimate!
Interview:
Gordon Honeycombe EXCLUSIVE
Gordon Honeycombe was twice voted the most popular
newscaster in Britain during the 12 years he spent with ITN, from 1965 to 1977
- but for many LostCousins members he will remembered
as the man who brought genealogy into our living rooms with the 5-part series Family History, which ran on BBC2 in
1979 and was repeated on BBC1.
This was a quarter century before Who Do You Think You Are? reached our screens, so I was delighted to have the
opportunity recently to speak on the telephone to Gordon, who now lives in Auatralia, about his career and his family history.
Peter: Gordon, you're known to most of us primarily as a
newscaster, but you're also an actor - at one time you were a member of the
Royal Shakespeare Company - and a published author. So how on earth did you
also find time to research your family tree?
Gordon: I began when I was at Oxford in 1960; that's when I
first went down to Cornwall and found that there were Honeycombes
in the parish registers, in particular at Calstock -
which is where Honeycombe House is (it was a semi-ruin at the time). At that
time the registers were kept in a safe at the church - and on the very first
page of the first register the rector opened was a Honeycombe marriage from the
16th century!
Peter: Is Honeycombe House still there?
Gordon: It's now a holiday centre called Honicombe
Manor (although it never was a manor house) and when I organised a gathering of
the Honeycombes in 1984 - a heritage weekend - 159 of
us, from all over the world, were able to stay in the various holiday homes at Honicombe itself.
Peter: That's an incredible number considering how rare the
surname is - there were less than 60 Honeycomb(e)s on
the 1881 Census. I assume many of them had emigrated before then?
Gordon:
Yes, to Australia, New Zealand,
Canada, South Africa and the USA.
Peter: Most of us start out on our research hoping to find
connections to the rich and famous, but very soon what most impresses us is the
fact that our poor ancestors survived at all.
Gordon:
All the Honeycombes
in the world descend from Matthew Honeycombe, a yeoman farmer who lived in St Cleer in Cornwall - there were many other Honeycombes in other villages, but all those lines died
out.
Peter:
The Family History series you
presented in 1979 must have encouraged many people to start researching their
family trees?
Gordon: I believe so. The series was repeated several times
and there was also a BBC book called Discovering
Your Family History by Don Steel.
Peter: On your website you mention that you bought a laptop
in 2003 - so presumably you did all your research up to that point the hard
way?
Gordon: Yes, I have spent many, many hours in churches and
county record offices looking at documents; also in the Society of
Genealogist's library, and in the offices of the Duchy of Cornwall where I was
able to peruse the original accession rolls and court rolls for the manor of Calstock - going back in my case to 1327, which is when we
first find the Honeycombe name, actually living at Honeycombe. I started making
a note of all the Honeycombe entries, and adding them to what I'd found in
parish records I managed to join them all into families and trees - and I
realised to my amazement that all the Honeycombes in
the world today are descended from Matthew Honeycombe of St Cleer.
Peter: You were fortunate to find that your common ancestor
lived after the commencement of parish registers.
Gordon: Unfortunately I don’t have a record of Matthew's
baptism - the early registers have been lost. But I think he was born about
1658 and I know which Honeycombes were in the village
at the time, and only a certain John Honeycombe, who fought for the Royalists
in the Civil War, could have been his father.
Peter:
Have you ever thought of verifying
that all the Honeycombes worldwide are related using DNA tests? It's not an
option that would have been available until fairly recently.
Gordon: I would love that to be done, I've thought about it
often. And I'd very much like the TV series, Who Do You Think You Are?, to help me find
my Scottish ancestors. My mother was a Fraser.
Peter: You're 77 this month, but you're still working - are
you ever going to retire, and what will you do?
Gordon: I've no thoughts of retiring as such. I've finished my
Memoirs but I'm having trouble finding a publisher - since finishing at TV-am
in 1989 and emigrating to Australia I'm no longer in the public eye.
Peter: Thank you very much indeed for being so patient.
Gordon: It's been a pleasure. And I hope that you and your
members will be able to help me with some of the gaps and loose ends in the
Honeycombe trees!
Genealogy in the
Sunshine: latest news
I've just sent out more details to the
members who had already expressed an interest in learning more about family
history whilst enjoying the sunshine and relative warmth of Portugal.
Genealogy
in the Sunshine runs for one week
from Saturday 15th March 2014, but anyone who wants to arrive early or leave
late can do so for a modest additional cost. We'll be staying at Rocha Brava, a
collection of villas and apartments fashioned in a traditional Algarve-style in
a beautiful cliff-top setting.
It's not a time of the year for
swimming, but most days it will be warm enough for sunbathing, with highs and
lows similar to those you'd expect in England in June and an average of 7-8
hours sunshine each day (about twice what you're likely to get in England in
March).
The course will involve 5 half-day
sessions so you'll have plenty of time to enjoy the sunshine and the scenery -
and because all of the villas and apartments have full kitchens you can eat as
cheaply as you would at home. However, if your idea of a holiday doesn't allow
for cooking there are plenty of restaurants and cafes within easy reach,
including the excellent O Farol restaurant in the
resort (where we'll be enjoying an end of course dinner to which everyone will
be invited - even the spouses who don't appreciate the joys of family history).
If the idea of combining genealogy with
winter sunshine appeals to you, let me know right away
- there are a limited number of places available.
Can you solve a
calendar conundrum?
I didn't give a closing date when I set
this competition in the last newsletter, so you've now got until Saturday 5th
October to send in your entry and - if your answer is judged the best - win a Francis
Frith 2014 calendar featuring 12 photos that you choose from the 365,000 in
their collection. Keep it for yourself or give it to someone you really care
about.
Understanding the calendar is important
if you're a family historian. Of course, everyone knows that if the year is
divisible by 4 then there are 29 days in February - for example, there were 29
days in February 2012, but only 28 in February this year. But it isn't quite as
simple as that, is it?
Even today, different calendars are used
in different parts of the world. If you were living in England, how many days
would there have been in each of these months, and why?
(a) February 1900
(b) February 1800
(c) February 1700
(d) February 1699
(e) September 1752
Trust me - it's not as easy as it looks!
Thanks to everyone who wrote in with
examples of unusual or amusing combinations for surnames following my article
in the last newsletter.
Liz wrote to tell me about her 1st
cousin 4 times removed, Mary Ann Winter who married Thomas Freezer - whilst their
granddaughter, Agnes Freezer married Frederic Warmer. Paul told me about
someone he once knew called Norman, who married a girl with the surname
Conquest.
But perhaps the best collection of names
came from Colin, whose surname is Fysh - which is
appropriate since his grandmother was a Skate and his great-great-great-great
grandmother was a Pike!
Following the last newsletter I also had
a lot of emails from members who had come across ridiculous things in other
peoples' family trees - such as people marrying before they were born. Several
members suggested I look at some of the trees which include Henry VIII, and I
was shocked by what I found. Everyone knows that Henry VIII had six wives -
except, it would appear, some of the people who have posted trees on Ancestry!
As I looked at some of the highly
questionable trees I came up with a theory why some of the more ridiculous
errors may be occurring - I suspect that they are a result of Gedcom files being merged. Now, if someone gives me access
to part of their tree I don't merge it with mine - I copy across the relevant
people and check the data as I do this (it's unusual not to find a slip or two,
and there are invariably some gaps that I'm able to fill, so I think it's time
well spent).
But if you're one of these 'name
collectors' with tens of thousands of names (I hesitate to say 'relatives') in
your tree, the chances are it has grown to that size by merging other peoples'
trees with your own.
Another source of errors seems to be the
use of drop-down menus for place names (at least, that's the most charitable
explanation I can come up with). History O-Level was the one examination I
failed at school, but even I could have told you that Queen Mary didn't die in
Westminster, Jefferson, Colorado (as 32 Ancestry users assert in their public
trees), or in Westminster, Worcester, Massachusetts (as a further 99 claim).
Mind you, go back a generation to
another Mary Tudor, Henry VIII's sister and the situation is even worse - in
their public trees 264 Ancestry users show her as dying in Suffolk,
Massachusetts (she actually died in Suffolk, England).
Since we've got quite a time to wait
before Steve Robinson's next genealogy mystery comes out I was absolutely
delighted when Michael told me about The
Marriage Certificate, by Stephen Molyneux. So
far three-quarters of the reviewers at Amazon have awarded 5 stars (the others
gave 4 stars) - so I had no hesitation buying it for my Kindle (it's also
available as a paperback). If you're outside the UK follow this link
to Amazon.com
What I didn't plan to do was start
reading it right away, but out of curiosity I took a look at the first page and
- you've guessed it - I was immediately hooked. Since then I've had trouble
putting it down, though I was determined to save it for my trip to Portugal (to
make the final arrangements for Genealogy
in the Sunshine).
Finally, I've got two tickets (worth £12
each) for the Tesco Wine Fair which takes place at the Queen Elizabeth II
Conference Centre in London on Sunday 6th October. If you and a friend would like to sample a wide range of wines and champagnes,
all completely free of charge, email me immediately - the first person to write in gets the tickets!
This where any late
updates will be posted, so it's worth checking back after a few days.
Until next time!
Peter Calver
Founder, LostCousins
© Copyright 2013 Peter Calver
You
MAY link to this newsletter or email a link to your friends and relatives
without asking for permission in advance. I have included bookmarks so you can
link to a specific article: right-click on the relevant entry in the table of
contents at the beginning of the newsletter to copy the link.
Please
DO NOT re-publish any part of this newsletter, other
than the list of contents at the beginning, without permission - either on your
own website, in an email, on paper, or in any other format. It is better for
all concerned to provide a link as suggested above, not least because articles
are often updated.