Newsletter
- 11th June 2014
How are
passport delays and the GRO connected?
Corrections
on BMD certificates
Masterclass: Extending your tree beyond 1911
Children's
Homes website goes live
Making
records accessible - and preventing their destruction
Western
Front Association overwhelmed by lookup requests
Was your
ancestor a PoW in WW1?
Red
Cross to make WW1 records available from August
Tony
Robinson's WDYTYA presentation
Can
we visualize our ancestors from their DNA?
The
cheapest ever Family Finder test
Using
DNA to knock down 'brick walls'
98
children - but still unmarried
Over 4
million Devon records go online
My
ancestor was a licensed victualler
The LostCousins newsletter is
usually published fortnightly. To access the previous newsletter (dated 29th
May) click here, for an index to articles
from 2009-10 click here, for
a list of articles from 2011 click here and for a
list of articles from 2012-13 click here.
Whenever possible links are
included to the websites or articles mentioned in the newsletter (they are
highlighted in blue or purple and underlined,
so you can't miss them).For your convenience, when you click on a link a new
browser window or tab will open (so that you don’t lose your place in the
newsletter) - if nothing seems to happen then you need to enable pop-ups in
your browser or change the settings in your security software.
To go to the main LostCousins
website click the logo at the top of this newsletter. If you're not already a
member, do join - it's FREE, and you'll get an email to alert you whenever
there's a new edition of this newsletter available!
How are passport delays and
the GRO connected?
If you live in the UK you'll almost
certainly be aware of this week's news stories about long delays at the
Passport Office - but you may not have connected them with the GRO.
In fact the General Register Office is
part of Her Majesty's Passport Office (formerly known as the Identity and
Passport Service), so the fact that they're both delivering a sub-optimal
service may not be a complete coincidence.
Note:
as far as I can see the highflying Sarah Rapson is still
nominally the Registrar General for England & Wales, even though she's now
in charge of a completely different part of the Home Office (her temporary
posting in April 2013 was confirmed in March of this year)!
Corrections on BMD
certificates
A birth, marriage, or death certificate
is a certified copy of the register entry - and whilst in former times they
would have borne handwritten or (later) typed copies of the entries, what we
see these days is usually an image of the actual entry in the register.
This means that where the register has
been amended you'll see the original version as well as the correction, which
can be confusing if you haven't seen an example before - so I was delighted
when Alan agreed to allow me to reproduce this birth certificate:
At first glance you might think that the
child's name was shown originally Charles M Heal - and wonder why his surname
has been crossed out, since even though he was clearly illegitimate, his
mother's surname was Heal.
However, if you look more closely you'll
see that the 'M' is really the number 17 - and that in the margin the registrar
has written "Seventeenth" and initialled it (all corrections to
registers must be numbered and initialled by the registrar in the margin).
But why has the surname been deleted?
There's no need to write in - I'm sure you all know the answer (but I'll give
it in my next newsletter, just in case).
Masterclass: Extending
your tree beyond 1911
If your family comes from England or
Wales, and you have a findmypast.co.uk or Ancestry.co.uk subscription you'll not only have access to
the fully transcribed birth, marriage, and death indexes but also to the
complete England & Wales 1911 Census. By combining these two resources
you'll probably find that you can add dozens of new relatives to your family
tree - without spending a penny on certificates!
Note: the links below are to
findmypast- I'll explain later why I've chosen this site.
Here's how I generally go about it:
(1) Where there are married couples on
the 1911 Census and the wife is of child-bearing age (typically up to 47) I
search the birth indexes for children born to the
couple using the family surname and mother's maiden name. The rarer the surnames
the more confident I can be about identifying the entries, especially if I also
take into account the choice of forenames, the timing of the births, and the
districts where the births were registered.
(2) I then check to see whether I can
identify marriages involving relatives who were
single in 1911. This is generally only possible when the surnames are fairly
uncommon (but see below).
(3) Having identified these post-1911
marriages, or possible marriages, I look in the birth indexes for children born to the
couple using the technique described in (1) above. Sometimes the choice of
forenames will help to confirm whether or not I've found the right marriage.
(4) I next look for the deaths of the couples whose children I've
been seeking. If the precise date of birth is included in the death indexes, as
it is for later entries, this often helps to confirm not only that I've found
the right death entry, but also - in the case of a female relative - that I've
found the right marriage. Even if I don't know exactly when my relative was
born, the quarter in which the birth was registered defines a 19 week window
(remember that births can be registered up to 6 weeks after the event). Why
does this work best for female relatives? Because they will have changed their
surname on marriage, so their birth will be registered in one name and the
death in another - and there will be a marriage that links the two.
(5) Now I start on the next generation,
the children who were recorded in 1911 or whose births I have been able to
identify as belonging to my tree. I look for both marriages and deaths, because if I find the death of a female
relative recorded under her maiden name, this usually indicates that she didn't
marry.
(6) Having identified marriages I then
look in the birth indexes for children born to those
marriages - and continue this process until either I reach the present day, or
I get to a point where I can't tell with reasonable certainty which entries
relate to my relatives.
There are all sorts of additional
sources of information you can use if you need to - including online family
trees at sites like Ancestry
and Genes
Reunited, social networking sites such as Friends Reunited and Facebook, plus the National
Probate Calendar (at Ancestry), Electoral
Registers (the UK registers from 2002-13 are included in all
findmypast.co.uk subscriptions), newspaper
announcements, and phone
directories (at Ancestry). And don't forget the power of Google!
Here are some key dates to bear in mind
when searching the GRO indexes:
2nd April 1911 - Census Day
1st July 1911 - from this date the mother's maiden name was included in
the birth indexes
1st January 1912 - the surname of the spouse was included in the
marriage indexes
1st January 1966 - from this date the first two forenames are shown in
full in the birth indexes
1st April 1969 - the precise date of birth was included in the death
indexes and the first two forenames were shown in full
During the 20th century middle names
are more consistent than they were in the 19th century - there is less of a
tendency for them to appear or disappear between birth, marriage, and death.
Unfortunately, for more than half a century after 1910 only the first forename
was shown in full in the birth and death indexes, and the marriage indexes only
show one forename for the whole period after 1910 - so a perfect match on the
second forename is only possible if the relative was born before 1911 and died
after March 1969.
What can you hope to achieve by
following the techniques I've described? In my case I've been able to extend
some lines forward by as many as four generations, although three is more
typical. In all I've added hundreds of 20th century relatives to my family tree
using these techniques, the majority of whom are still living.
Of course, if you decide to contact a
living relative you've identified in this way you're unlikely to find that they
share your interest in family history - though there's a fair chance that
they'll be able to tell you of someone else who is doing
research. (By contrast, when you find a living relative through LostCousins you
know at the outset that they're interested in family history - otherwise they
wouldn't have joined, and wouldn't have had the necessary census information.)
Why use findmypast, and not Ancestry or
FreeBMD? The BMD
searches at Ancestry aren't quite as user-friendly, because whilst findmypast
allows you to search the entire period with a single search, at Ancestry
pre-1915 records must be searched separately. As for FreeBMD, there is little
coverage after 1970, and none at all after 1983; there are also some
significant gaps after 1939.
Children's Homes
website goes live
Last month a new website which will
provide help - and perhaps hope - to those whose ancestors were
institutionalised as children. The Children's
Homes website has been created by Peter Higginbotham, whose Workhouses website has been immensely
useful to family historians. You can view lists of homes according to type or location,
and in most cases there are facts and figures, often indicating where the
records might be found.
Making records
accessible - and preventing their destruction
Around the world organisations are
improving access to records from World War 1 to mark the centenary - but what a
shame more of these records weren't available when the soldiers, sailors, and
others who contributed to the war effort were still alive! Last week we
celebrated the 70th anniversary of D-Day - but all too few of the brave men who
landed on the Normandy beaches were able to join in.
Of course, it's important that the privacy
of individuals is protected - but some of the records now going online have
always been publicly-available (though hard to track down), or were very expensive
to access until they were digitized. Had I not requested my father's WW2
records while he was still alive it would have cost me £30 to obtain them after
his death - yet I downloaded my grandfather's WW1 records as part of my findmypast
subscription, so they didn't really cost me anything.
And yet there's an even worse problem
ahead - so many 20th century records were thoughtlessly destroyed. I'm not
thinking about military records, but hospital and other medical records, school
records, employment records - even tax records, I suspect. My guess is that
over 99% of the records that relate to you and I have been destroyed - or will
have been by the time we get around to asking to see them. When I tried to
access my school records from the 1950s I was told they no longer existed; when
I wanted to see my hospital records from the 1950s I was told they had been
destroyed.
Why not sit down for a moment and
imagine you were planning to write your autobiography: what information from
your past do you wish you'd recorded? And what information (that others would
have recorded at the time) would you now like to be able to access?
The chances are that you don't have
diaries or other records to remind you what you did when, so unless you can
refer to contemporaneous records you'd probably have to rely on your memory - and
we all know how unreliable (and selective) that can be!
In the 21st century more personal
information than ever before is being recorded, but not for our benefit - it's
mostly to help supermarkets, credit agencies, and advertisers to run their
businesses more profitably. Tesco have recorded every purchase I've made since
their Clubcard was introduced, but I bet you that if
I asked them for a copy I'd discover that they no longer have the data.
The conundrum is that the Data Protection
Act doesn't protect data, it only controls access to
data. For many organisations the simplest approach is to destroy the
information they hold - about us
- when it's no longer of use to them.
Is that right?
Action
for Children is the new name for the
National Childrens Homes, which cared for tens of thousands
of children following its foundation in 1869. Unfortunately they will only
provide information from their records to those who have personally benefited
from their services - which they're presumably obliged to do under the Data
Protection Act. They claim they don't have the resources to provide information
to the descendants of children who were in their care.
They'll happily take your donations -
there's a 'Donate' button on just about every page of the website - but they
won't provide you with information about your ancestors who were in their care
no matter how much you donate! I don't have any personal interest in obtaining
records from this charity, but if I did I'd find it extremely frustrating, to
say the least - surely records over 100 years old could be made available
online?
Western Front Association
overwhelmed by lookup requests
The Western Front Association took over
more than 6 million pension record cards relating to soldiers of the Great War
when the Ministry of Defence was no longer able to keep them. The long term aim
is to make the records available online, but in the meantime there is a manual
look-up service which has proven so popular that it is taking 2 months or more
for requests to be filled.
You'll find details of the look-up
service here.
Was your ancestor a PoW in WW1?
The
Genealogist recently added a database of 80,000 records relating to British
and Commonwealth servicemen and women held prisoner during the Great War. All the
records I've looked at are taken from casualty lists, so the information you'll
discover is quite restricted - often there's little beyond the name, rank, and
number - but since so many WW1 records have been lost, it might be all that's
available, at least until the International Committee of the Red Cross release
their enormous collection....
Note:
there is an excellent article about WW1 PoWs in the
June 2014 issue of 'Your Family Tree'.
Red Cross to make WW1
records available from August
From August this year it will be
possible to search for records of WW1 prisoners and internees kept on 6 million
index cards by the International Prisoners-of-War Agency set up by the Red
Cross. During the First World War, the Agency collected, analysed and
classified information it received from the detaining powers and national
agencies about prisoners of war and civilian internees. It compared this
information with requests submitted to it by relatives or friends, in order to
restore contact between them.
It isn't clear exactly what information
will be available, but it will certainly make the process of accessing the records
far more efficient.
Work has already commenced on the WW2
records - held on 36 million index cards - and the first batch, relating to
French PoWs, should be completed during 2016.
Tony Robinson's
WDYTYA presentation
At this year's
Who Do You Think You Are? Live show
Sir Tony Robinson, one of the best-known amateur historians in the world, gave
a fascinating 45 minute lecture in the Ancestry theatre - you can see it again here.
Can we visualize our
ancestors from their DNA?
Scientists are predicting that in 5 to
10 years' time it will be possible to predict a person's face from their DNA -
just imagine how useful that would be to police forces around the world!
But when I read about this in New
Scientist a couple of months ago I wasn't thinking about criminals - I
was wondering whether it might one day be possible to see what my ancestors
looked like, even if they were born long before photography was invented. This
was also the focus of a BBC article that was
posted last week.
Of course, if you don't have a DNA
sample to start with there's nothing you can do - or is there? Perhaps the
relevant sections of our ancestors' DNA could be reconstructed using our DNA,
and the DNA of other descendants? I'm not so sure it would work - but this is
one time I'd be delighted to be proved wrong!
The cheapest ever
Family Finder test
Until Tuesday 17th June you can save $20
on a Family Finder autosomal DNA test at Family
Tree DNA - you'll now pay just $79 (about £47) instead of $99. Even $99
seems cheap - I paid $159 for my Family Finder test, and that was a special
offer!
Whereas you might choose a Y-DNA test to
investigate your direct paternal line (your father's father's
father.....) or an mtDNA test for your direct
maternal line (your mother's mother's mother.....),
autosomal testing samples the 22 pairs of chromosomes that are inherited from
both of our parents - and which they inherited from both of their parents, and
so on.
It's therefore the only DNA test you can
take that will tell you anything about the ancestors in the middle of your
family tree (Y-DNA and mtDNA can only tell you about
the lines that run up the extreme edges). But precisely what might you find out
when you take the test?
Family Tree DNA match
your results against those of all the others who have taken the same test - and
list the matches with estimated relationship. For example, my best matches are
7 people who most likely to be 3rd cousins, but could be in the range 2nd to
4th cousins - which means that the common ancestor might be a great
grandparent, a great-great grandparent, or a great-great-great grandparent.
In effect it's a bit like LostCousins -
except that the matching is based on DNA, not census records!
Family Finder DNA test |
LostCousins census matches |
Cost of test $99 ($79 during offer) |
Free to search, but you might have to
become a subscriber to make contact with the cousins you find (cost £10 for
12 months) |
No effort required - just take a cheek
swab |
Enter your relatives from the 1881
census - the more you enter, the more matches you'll get |
Only finds cousins |
Also finds relatives who are related
by marriage or adoption |
Results based on biological evidence |
Results based on research |
Typical match 2nd-5th cousin, but it
probably won't be immediately obvious how you are connected |
Typical match 2nd-5th cousin, and
you'll know almost immediately who your common ancestors were |
Once you've taken the test you'll get
more matches as more of your cousins take the test |
Once you've entered your relatives you'll
get more matches as more of your cousins take part in the project |
Tip: if you've tested at Family Tree DNA, or are considering doing so,
why not check the list
of projects that you can join - these include geographical projects as well
as surname projects. It's free to join a project, but you must meet the entry
requirements.
Using DNA to knock
down 'brick walls' #1
There are two ways to approach DNA
testing - you can take a test and hope that you get some useful matches, or you
can identify a particular problem that needs solving, such as the parentage of
an illegitimate ancestor. Often you'll have a theory who
the father of an illegitimate child may have been, but unless Poor Law records
that identify him have survived you're unlikely to find documentary evidence to
support your theory.
Proving (or disproving) your theory through
DNA testing is often possible, but you usually need to have another sample to
compare your DNA against. Here's the question that you should ask yourself:
"if there is someone alive today who shares my putative ancestor's
Y-chromosome (or mtDNA), who will they be
descended from?"
You might think that the answer to that
question is simply "my ancestor", but that's the lazy answer. Why?
Because the Y-chromosome or mtDNA in
question didn't suddenly materialise when your ancestor was born - it was
inherited from their father or mother.
This diagram illustrates how Y-DNA and mtDNA are passed down the generations - remember that
mothers pass mtDNA to all of their children, but
fathers pass Y-DNA only to their sons:
Imagine you're Robert Bradford, whose
paternal grandfather was illegitimate. You've obviously inherited your
great-grandfather's Y-chromosome which provides a clue to his identity - but
only if you can match it against another sample. Often you wouldn't have any
idea who the father of the illegitimate child was, so the best you can do is
take a Y-DNA test yourself and see if there are any matches in the database of
the testing company, or other accessible databases, that will provide a clue to
the surname of your unknown paternal ancestor.
But let's suppose that in this
particular case you have a strong suspicion that the father of Mary Bradford's
child James was one Roger Smith - maybe he was lodging with the family at the
time when the child was conceived, but died before James was born. Or perhaps
there is a family story that points in Roger Smith's direction.
Now, because Roger Smith died before marrying, and - to the best of your knowledge - before
fathering any other children, the only person who will have inherited his
Y-chromosome is your ancestor James Bradford. So is this a hopeless cause?
No, it isn't - because Roger will have
inherited his Y-chromosome from his own father, John, and John had another son,
also called John Smith, who was living at home with Roger and his parents on the
1881 Census. Perhaps John married and had a son? If so, you might be able to
find a living Smith who is in his direct male line of descent?
The only problem is, John Smith is such
a common name that trying to track his marriage and his descendants would be
really, really difficult - and that's where LostCousins can help. On your My Ancestors page you could enter not
only Roger Smith, but also his brother John and their father - not as
relatives, because that's speculative, but using the 'DNA research' category. You'll
then be matched with the other LostCousins members who have entered any one of
them within seconds of clicking the Search button.
Of course, you're not guaranteed of a
match, and even if there is a match, you don't know that Roger's brother had
any sons. But since it will only take a couple of minutes to add the 1881
Census data for this family to your My Ancestors page, it's
got to be worth a try.
Note: many people take DNA tests
without any real understanding of how they might help resolve their questions
about their family tree. Using the 'DNA research' feature doesn't commit you in
any way to taking a DNA test - it merely helps to create a situation in which
taking a test is more likely to tell you something useful!
In the next three weeks there are two talks
from experts that could help shine light into the dark corners of our
ancestors' lives. This Saturday, 14th June, Dr Simon Pawley will be exploring
bigamy, in a talk entitled "The Loneliness of the Long Distance
Bigamist" at the Lincolnshire
Family History Society; then on the evening of Wednesday 2nd July,
Professor Rebecca Probert (author of Marriage
Law for Genealogists) will be giving a talk entitled "Tracing
Marriages: Legal Requirements and Actual Practice 1700-1900" for Buckinghamshire
Family History Society in Bletchley.
Tip:
while I was looking up the details of Professor Probert's
lecture I noticed another BFHS event that could be equally fascinating -
Michael Kushner will be talking about "Black Propaganda Radio: Britain’s
Biggest Hoax" in Aylesbury on the afternoon of Saturday 21st June.
Thomas Hardy's The
Mayor of Casterbridge begins with a man
selling his wife by auction, so when I saw the headline "Rugby star's wife
puts her marriage on eBay" in The
Times in March I couldn't resist reading the article beneath - but in fact
she wasn't selling her husband, but her wedding ring, wedding dress, and the
love letters her husband had sent in better times. Surprisingly Hardy's tale
was fact-based, as a search of the British Newspaper
Archive will demonstrate.
98 children - but still
unmarried
Dutchman Ed Houben
claims to have fathered more children than any other man in Europe, with 98 to
his name, according to this BBC story. This reminded
me of the 2003 DNA study (reported here
on the National Geographic website
but also found on many other sites) which suggested that there are 16 million
men who are direct descendants of Genghis Khan in the male line (which suggests
that after 30 generations there could be hundreds of millions, perhaps billions
of people who are descended in some way from the great warrior).
Will researchers in 800 years time discover millions of Houben's
descendants? Perhaps - but the Genghis Khan theory seems to be the result of journalists
jumping to the wrong conclusion, as this 2012 blog posting
explains.
Meanwhile, a recent article
in The Guardian demonstrates that
fathering lots of children can be a risky strategy - if you're a bear.
Over 4 million Devon
records go online
Just after the last newsletter was
published findmypast
announced that they had added over 4 million Devon records to their site. Some
parishes are missing: this
page at the Devon Heritage Centre website lists parishes for which the
registers have not yet been digitized (including Salcombe
and Malborough, where some of my ancestors lived),
but in most cases they will be added in the not-too-distant future. However,
there are two parishes for which the incumbent has not given permission for
digitization.
You can find out more about the Devon
Collection here.
My
ancestor was a licensed victualler
My great-great-great-great grandfather
was the licensee of "The Compasses" in Patchetts
Green until his death in 1837 (he thoughtfully waited until civil registration
had been in place for 2 weeks before expiring).
I'm glad to see that not only is the pub
still standing, it's still a pub - so many have been turned into homes and
restaurants, or simply demolished. I wonder if my family connection would be
worth a free drink? Sadly, I suspect not.
On Tuesday I was in a pub near Cambridge
where I noticed a framed list on the wall of landlords from 1729 to the present day - it's common to see lists
of vicars in churches, but I think this is the first time I've seen a list of landlords
in a pub.
(Sorry about the quality of the photo -
if I had had more time I would have asked Repixl to bring it up to
scratch.)
A couple of weeks ago Jill wrote from
Australia to remind me about the Pubs
History website, which covers most of the counties of southern England - it
has lists of landlords for thousands of pubs, although the information seems to
be taken mainly from directories or censuses, and usually only goes back as far
as the late 19th century.
Record offices usually hold licensing
records for their area, so if you have ancestors who ran a pub it's well worth
checking to see what information has survived.
In the summer of 1953 two very different
men were each teaching youngsters how to win at the board game Solitaire. (Not
to be confused with the Solitaire card game, which we call Patience in England, it was played with marbles on a wooden board -
rather like this
one, in fact.)
Less than a year later both men were
dead, one of natural causes, the other probably by his own hand - but even
after 60 years the two youngsters, now old enough to be grandparents, can still
remember their lessons. One of those men was my grandfather; the other was Alan
Turing, the computing pioneer who had helped to crack the Enigma code at
Bletchley Park (I'm talking about what actually happened, by the way - not the movie
version).
I was reminded of my own experience when
I read this BBC article
about Maria Summerscale, who met Alan Turing when she
was 7 years old, and still has the letter he wrote explaining how to play
Solitaire. Isn't it strange how we can remember these relatively unimportant
things from such a long time ago?
I'm going to keep it short and sweet this time, as this
newsletter is already longer than usual.
I was amused when I saw this sell by
sticker yesterday in my local supermarket - I don't know whether you can read
it, but it says "Eat within 2 hours of purchase". This is the first
time I've seen such precision, or such a short shelf life - and it also made me
wonder how long it had been sitting there on the shelf......
That was the short bit - now for the sweet
bit. Do you have a favourite recipe for fudge? If so, please drop me an email.
I haven't made fudge since I was a child, but I bought some at a garden gate
recently - which reminded me how much nicer the home-made confection is than
the shop-bought variety (it really does melt in your mouth).
This is where you'll find corrections or
urgent news.
Thanks for taking the time to read my
newsletter - I hope you found it interesting, and perhaps even amusing in
places! Many of the articles are inspired by emails from people just like you,
so do please write in with your tips and questions.
Peter Calver
Founder, LostCousins
© Copyright 2014 Peter Calver
You
MAY link to this newsletter or email a link to your friends and relatives
without asking for permission in advance - I have included bookmarks so you can
link to a specific article: right-click on the relevant entry in the table of
contents at the beginning of this newsletter to copy the link. But why not
invite them to join?