Newsletter - 11th December 2017
New subscriptions at Findmypast's
UK site
Findmypast supercharge baptism
searches
Where did that marriage take place?
WARNING: Ancestry tree information may be corrupted
The best Christmas present, past and future
Ancestry sell nearly 2 million DNA tests in 4 days
Save on DNA tests in Australia & New Zealand
Save on genealogical mysteries ENDS SATURDAY
Stop Press INCLUDES ANCESTRY UK OFFER
The LostCousins newsletter is usually published
2 or 3 times a month. To access the previous newsletter (dated 24th November)
click here; to find earlier articles use the
customised Google search below (it searches ALL of the newsletters since
February 2009, so you don't need to keep copies):
Whenever
possible links are included to the websites or articles mentioned in the
newsletter (they are highlighted in blue or purple and underlined, so you can't miss
them). If one of the links doesn't work this normally indicates that you're
using adblocking software - you need to make the LostCousins site an exception
(or else use a different browser, such as Chrome).
To go to the main LostCousins website click the
logo at the top of this newsletter. If you're not already a member, do join -
it's FREE, and you'll get an email to alert you whenever there's a new edition
of this newsletter available!
Searching for cousins is
always free, but to initiate contact with a new cousin normally requires a LostCousins subscription - however from Christmas Day to
New Year's Eve the LostCousins site will be
COMPLETELY FREE.
My advice is to complete your
My Ancestors page in advance - don't leave it until Christmas, as you might
find you have other things to do……
On 28th November I published
an updated version of the 1939 Register Special Edition of this newsletter -
you'll find it here
(for convenience there's also a link from the Subscribers Only page of the LostCousins
website).
The revised edition was
published to coincide with Findmypast's introduction
of new subscription packages at their UK site, which - for the first time -
offer subscribers with 1 Month subscriptions access to the 1939 Register for
England & Wales.
Note: the 1939 Register is included in the Plus and
Pro subscriptions, but not the Starter subscription (which isn’t really suitable for LostCousins
members anyway).
If you've never searched the
1939 Register, or have only viewed records using credits, now is the time to
catch up - it can cost you as little as £12.95! Bear in mind that all Findmypast subscriptions are renewed automatically by
default, but you can unsubscribe at any time by unticking the box on the Personal Details tab of the My Account section.
You can support LostCousins by using this link
to go to the Findmypast website.
New
subscriptions at Findmypast's UK site
In the previous article I
briefly mentioned the new subscription packages at Findmypast's
UK site (there is no change at any of their other sites). This screenshot summarises
what's on offer:
The key differences are:
The three new subscription
packages are the only ones that will be offered to new or lapsed subscribers,
but if you currently have a Britain
subscription you can stay with it as long as you like
(provided you set it to Auto-Renew).
You can support LostCousins by using this link
to go to the Findmypast website.
Findmypast supercharge
baptism searches
Over the past year I've
demonstrated how LostCousins members can get more out
of Findmypast searches than anyone else by making use
of the tips and tricks that I've discovered.
Well, it seems you weren't
the only ones reading those articles: when Findmypast
realised how their baptism searches could be made more powerful they set their
programmers to work - and they've now enhanced the global baptism Search form
to allow researchers to enter the forenames of the child's father and/or mother
(where known) This is great news for all
Findmypast users, because most of the time we run up
against a 'brick wall' it’s because we can’t find our ancestor's baptism - so
I'm absolutely delighted that they 'nicked' my idea!
Tip: don't enter the parents' surnames as not all of the record sets include this information.
There's a very useful PDF
guide to modern marriage regulations on the UK Parliament website which details
the requirements for both civil and religious marriages - and describes the
changes that were introduced in 2008 (in England) and 2010 (in Wales).
Prior to 2008 "a couple
could generally marry only in the parish church of a parish where one or both of them were resident or one or both of them had their
names on the church electoral roll. If a couple wished to marry anywhere else they generally had to apply for an Archbishop of
Canterbury’s Special Licence with the support of the Minister of the church
where they wished to marry."
You can download the document
here
Note: the information in the document on marriage in
Scotland is more limited, but there are links to other sources of information.
The latest (November 2017)
edition of the General Register Office's Guidebook
for the Clergy goes into a lot of detail about the rules and
regulations governing marriages, including the procedure for corrections, and
the submission of quarterly copies to the GRO. It also deals with matters
concerning baptisms and burials.
Although the regulations and
practices in both of these documents will have been
revised many times since the time of our ancestors they’re a very useful guide
to the issues we need to consider when trying to analyse our ancestors'
decision-making.
When LostCousins
member Andrew was presented with these results when searching marriages at FreeBMD he was understandably confused:
What a confusion of names -
and to cap it all the surnames Peat and Moss are more reminiscent of something
you'd find at the garden centre than a Register Office!
The first step is to remind
ourselves that these are entries from the GRO indexes, ie
the indexes to the registers held at the General Register Office. Each marriage
involves two people - that's one of the few things that hasn't changed, at
least in Britain - so the number of entries in the index for a given page in
the marriage register should be twice the number of marriages on that page. Except
in the early years of civil registration there are usually just two marriages
per page (you can confirm this by looking up other page numbers for the same
quarter) so you'd expect there to be just four names -
but that isn't always the case.
For example, there might be
alternative spellings of the names, as in these entries:
Note:The spouse's
surname doesn't appear in the marriage indexes until 1912 - if it had there
would have been two more entries on this page, whether it is was Isaac who
married Sarah and James who married Emily or vice versa (actually it was James
who married Emily - I found them on the 1881 Census).
Another reason there might be
more than twice as many index entries as marriages in the register is when one
of the parties was using an alias. For example, if a couple who were living together
as man and wife, but were actually unmarried, decided
to regularise their relationship there would be two surnames for the bride, her
actual surname and the one she was known by. Indeed, that's what seems to have
happened in the example we started with - if Mabel Sharpe was living with
Wilfred Peat and known as Mabel Peat, when they married both surnames would be
shown in the register and on any certificate.
What makes that first example
particularly confusing is that there's another Sharpe who married another Mabel
(Moss), in the same location in the same quarter, and quite possibly on the
same day. Was Thomas Sharpe the brother of Mabel? I suspect he was, but they're
not my family, so I won't be ordering the marriage certificates.
Tip: if an alias is shown in the marriage register
it's very likely that the marriage took place in a register office - it's
certainly very rare to see an alias in a church marriage register.
Where
did that marriage take place?
It's over 6 years since I
first wrote about the Marriage
Locator website, and in that time the coverage has greatly expanded. Set up
by the Guild of One-Name Studies as a free service, the site aims to pinpoint
where in England or Wales a marriage took place simply from the references
given in the General Register Office indexes.
True, the indexes give you
the registration district - but they don't tell you whether the marriage took
place in the register office or a church, or which church it was, even though
this information can often be deduced (because entries are grouped together -
you can find out more here).
If you know that a marriage
took place in the parish church it gives you the option of looking it up in the
register at the relevant record office - or even online - potentially saving
you the cost of buying a copy marriage certificate. I find it particularly
useful when the registers are online, but unindexed - as is the case for Essex,
for example.
Note: Marriage Locator is a continuing project so you won’t always get a definitive answer even
within the years of coverage (1837-1945).
WARNING:
Ancestry tree information may be corrupted
I was contacted this week by
a member who has given a number of Ancestry users
access to his tree, but with different levels of permission, ie most are Guests,
who can see the tree but not make any changes, some are Contributors, who can add comments and stories, and a couple are Editors, who can add or edit people.
Unfortunately, the
permissions appear to have become confused so that some people who were only
Guests are now Contributors or Editors (the reader who contacts me suspects
that an Ancestry site update has triggered the problem). If you have given
anyone access to your tree(s) I recommend you check that the permissions are
still shown correctly.
This might also explain why I
recently discovered that one of my Ancestry trees was public - they're normally
all private. I assumed at the time that I was the one who had made a mistake,
but now I'm not so sure.
Although I don’t have a
public tree at Ancestry, nor would I recommend that LostCousins
members do so, that doesn't stop me from looking at public trees from time to
time, particularly when I'm helping members or researching an article. This
week I searched for an 'Arthur William Smallwood' and was most surprised to see
that the second search result (out of more than 16,000) was for someone called
' Umphery Posey Crone'.
I'm not quite sure how this
aberration occurred, but looking at the tree in pedigree view (below) it appears to have become
very confused - so I'm wondering whether this is another example of corrupted
data?
You'll also notice that the
dates shown are impossible, and that the parents shown in the search results
aren't the parents shown in the pedigree. Of course, this could have happened
for any number of reasons, but it does remind me to warn you once again that
your main tree should be on your own computer, rather than online. A good
family tree program such as Family Historian
can cost under £40, which is a small price to pay for the security it brings -
and a tree program on your own computer is always going to be more powerful
than one that's online.
Tip: when I save my family tree I include the date in
the filename, which means that it doesn’t over-write the previous version. I
suggest you adopt a similar system if you possibly can.
I once tried a pizza called
Sloppy Giuseppe, but I wouldn’t recommend it - and the same goes for sloppy
genealogies. Wishful thinking can be inspirational, but deluding ourselves and
others is not only dishonest, it's ultimately pointless.
There's a wonderful article by
Anthony Camp in the December issue of the Journal of the Society of
Genealogists: George Gair
(or Sutherland) alias Robert Gayre of Gayre and Nigg tells the
story of the apparently fraudulent genealogy compiled by Lieutenant-Colonel
Robert Gayre in order to
support his claim to be descended in the male line from one Alexander Gair, even though he must have known that his own father
was illegitimate, and inherited the Gair surname from
his mother. It also seems that at one point he pretended that his father was
dead, even though he was still very much alive.
It's amazing what lengths
people will go to in order to fool themselves and -
sometimes - others!
I'm delighted to announce
that the Society of Genealogists have generously agreed to extend the 25% first
year discount for LostCousins members who join,
either as a Full Member, or as an Associate. You'll find more details here.
In World War 1 there was to
be no food rationing in Britain until January 1918, the last year of the war -
but in World War 2 bacon, butter, and sugar were rationed from 8th January
1940, just 4 months into the war, and many other foods were added to the list.
Ration books bore the same
numbers as identity cards - the references from the 1939
Register. There are some interesting articles about rationing on the BBC
History website - this
one is particularly good, and so is this
one.
Considering that meat was one
of the most sought-after foods you might have thought vegetarians would be
well-placed to exchange their meat ration for other food - but in practice the
Committee of Vegetarian Interests campaigned for special
ration books to be issued (these offered extra cheese, and vegetarian margarine
instead of butter). There's an interesting chapter on rationing which I found here,
at Google Books, and there's also a good article on the Findmypast
blog.
The best
Christmas present, past and future
With Christmas fast
approaching it's time to decide what we're going to give and - if we're lucky
enough to be asked - what we want to receive. I suspect that for many people
this year it's going to be a DNA test, given the enormous number that Ancestry
sold between Black Friday and Cyber Monday, but the gift that's most likely to
light up the eyes of a family historian is more traditional and less commercial
- it's the discovery of a new living cousin!
Connecting with a fellow
researcher who shares your ancestors can transform your research - not just
because it allows you to exchange past
discoveries, but because it also offers the opportunity to collaborate on future research.
Finding genetic cousins is
easy - you'll be matched with thousands of them - but trying to document how you are related to any one of them is
usually very difficult and time-consuming. The best strategies are outlined in
my recent Masterclass: What to do with
your autosomal DNA results (you'll find it here),
but anyone who thinks that DNA offers an easy answer hasn't been reading my
newsletters. It will typically involve HUNDREDS OF HOURS of research, much of
it ultimately fruitless.
Fortunately there is a simple, quick, and extremely
cost-effective way to connect with other researchers who are your documented cousins
- and it will generally start producing results in under ONE HOUR!
All you need to do is
complete your My Ancestors page,
entering as many relatives as possible from the 1881 Censuses. It might take
you 5 minutes to enter your very first household (the illustrated Getting Started guide on the Help & Advice page
shows what to do), but once you've got the hang of it you'll find that it only
takes 1 minute (or perhaps 2 for a large household).
So don’t be a Scrooge - do what you can to connect with
your cousins this Christmas!
Note: DNA testing does have a place in the
genealogist's toolkit - it's ideal for knocking down the 'brick walls' that
can't be a solved by conventional records-based research, whether because the
records we need don't exist, because there are two or more plausible
candidates, or perhaps because an ancestor turns up in a big city with no
evidence of his or her origins.
Ancestry sell
nearly 2 million DNA tests in 4 days
Ancestry have announced that
in the four days from Back Friday to Cyber Monday they sold more than 3 times
as many tests as in the equivalent period of 2016 - and since they sold they
reported sales of 560.000 kits then, simple arithmetic shows that they most
have sold upwards of 1.6m this year.
Whilst many of them will have
been sold to people who don't have a family tree, and maybe never will, it’s still
an amazing statistic.
UPDATE: see the next article for the current offer in Australia and
New Zealand and Stop Press for a UK & Ireland offer.
Tip: if you have tested with Ancestry be sure to
follow the strategies set out in my recent Masterclass
- it will make a world of difference to the results you get!
Save on DNA tests
in Australia & New Zealand
Although I originally tested
with Family Tree DNA, I retested with Ancestry earlier this year in order to get access to the thousands of cousins in their
database - and I'm very glad that I did, as I've made significant progress on
some of the 'brick walls' that have been blocking my path for 15 years!
Although the Black Friday sales
are over, Ancestry have decided to launch a very attractive offer in Australia
and New Zealand ONLY, which runs until Friday 22nd December. Please use this link to support LostCousins. If you don't see the graphic above log-out from
your Ancestry account and click the link again - and if you still don't see it,
click the Ancestry logo in the top left corner of the page. That definitely works!
Note: the sale at Family Tree DNA is continuing -
please use this link. Family Tree DNA is the only major
company offering Y-DNA tests, and they're also the only company to charge the
same price worldwide (only the shipping charge varies). Whilst their Family
Finder test is equivalent to the Ancestry DNA test, you cannot transfer FTDNA
results to Ancestry (which is why I had to re-test), whereas you can transfer
Ancestry results to FTDNA.
Save on
genealogical mysteries ENDS
SATURDAY
Until midnight on Saturday 16th December readers in
the UK and US can get the first three Jayne Sinclair genealogical mysteries as
a Kindle set for just £1.99, less than the normal price of a single book. MJ
Lee is one of my favourite authors, and the twists and turns in his most recent
book kept my enthralled from beginning to end (you'll find my review here).
Please use the links below so
that you can support LostCousins - it may only be a
few pennies, but every little helps! Unfortunately this offer cannot be made available in
Australia or Canada - nothing to do with me or the author, it's an Amazon
thing.
Note: I understand that we might see the fourth Jayne
Sinclair novel before Easter - which gives you just enough time to read the
first three! I'll let you know more in due course.
I'm still working my way
through Kat Arney's How to Code a Human - which
has so much detail that it needs to be read in bite-sized chunks; in between
I'm reading At Home by Bill Bryson, a 700 page history
book that's absolutely crammed with fascinating facts and interesting stories.
Because there's so much happening in the world of
family history these days I'm sending out many more emails than ever before. So to avoid cluttering up your inbox, from time to time I
will be including information for LostCousins subscribers
in the newsletter rather than sending out a separate mailing.
Recently added to the Subscribers Only page at the LostCousins website is the first draft of a new Beginners
Guide for those just starting to research their family history. I'd appreciate
it if you could let me know about any errors and omissions that you spot, as
I'm hoping to launch the new guide in time for Christmas.
I doubt there are any readers
of this newsletter who are directly involved in Bitcoin speculation, but
whenever there's a crash innocent people like you and me can suffer, so I've
been trying to figure out what the collateral damage might be on this occasion.
Whilst most will have
speculated with their own money, it’s inevitable that as a bubble reaches its
peak some will use borrowed money. So, as a precaution, I've decided to
temporarily reduce my involvement in peer-to-peer lending by turning off the
reinvestment of repayments.
I've just been informed
that Ancestry UK are discounting DNA tests from £79 to £63 (plus shipping) until
Christmas Eve - although if you delay your order until 24th December don't expect to
get the kit in time for Christmas! Please use this
link if you want your purchase to
support LostCousins.
I'm sure I'll be
in touch again before Christmas, but just in case we miss each other, allow me
to wish you all the best for the coming festive season, and for the year ahead.
Peter Calver
Founder,
LostCousins
Please do NOT copy or republish any part
of this newsletter without permission - which is only granted in the most
exceptional circumstances. However, you MAY link to this newsletter or any article in
it without asking for permission - though why not invite other family
historians to join LostCousins instead, since standard membership (which
includes the newsletter), is FREE?