Newsletter
- 2nd September 2014
Big
savings on Y-DNA tests ENDS WEDNESDAY
What an amazing
discovery can tell us about the censuses
Lost
manuscript found after 45 years
Dorset
couple celebrate their 80th wedding anniversary!
WW1 PoW records: further information
Some of
the more unusual pictures from the Great War
WW1
officers' records now searchable online
Medway
casualty index goes live
Do
you have an Anderson shelter in your garden?
The history
of the United Kingdom
Searching
for Scottish cousins
Have you
been invited to join the forum?
The
Lost Ancestor - and other genealogical mysteries
Professional
Genealogists put to the Test
The LostCousins newsletter is
usually published fortnightly. To access the previous newsletter (dated 21st
August) click here, for an index to articles
from 2009-10 click here, for
a list of articles from 2011 click here and for a
list of articles from 2012-13 click here.
Whenever possible links are
included to the websites or articles mentioned in the newsletter (they are
highlighted in blue or purple and underlined,
so you can't miss them).For your convenience, when you click on a link a new
browser window or tab will open (so that you don’t lose your place in the
newsletter) - if nothing seems to happen then you need to enable pop-ups in
your browser or change the settings in your security software.
To go to the main LostCousins
website click the logo at the top of this newsletter. If you're not already a
member, do join - it's FREE, and you'll get an email to alert you whenever
there's a new edition of this newsletter available!
Big savings on Y-DNA tests ENDS WEDNESDAY
You've got just one day to take
advantage of the Family Tree
DNA End-of-Summer Sale, which offers big discounts on Y-DNA tests. For example,
a 37-marker test - the one I started with - costs just $129 (plus $9.95
shipping).
You don't have to return your sample
before the offer runs out - you only need to place your order (and pay).
Remember that the Y-chromosome is passed from father to son, so follows the
direct paternal line - the one that one a conventional tree runs down the
left-hand side.
Providing a sample is simple - you just
scrape the plastic implement on the inside of your cheek (just don't do it
immediately after a meal).
Of course, half the people reading this
won't be able to provide a sample for a Y-DNA test - because they're female -
but even if you're male, you might not be the right person to provide a sample.
For example, when I wanted to trace my maternal grandfather's line I couldn't
provide a sample myself, nor could any of my 1st cousins (because my
grandfather had 4 daughters and no sons) - instead I asked a more distant
cousin to provide a sample.
The general rule is that you need to
find a male relative with the same surname as the male ancestor whose
antecedents you're trying to track - because surnames also pass from father to
son.
If you decide to take advantage of this
offer please follow this link so
that LostCousins will earn some commission.
What an amazing discovery
can tell us about the censuses
In March this year, attendees at the
first Genealogy in the Sunshine event
sat in awe as Donald Davis, who had flown over from Canada, described his
ground-breaking research into the census. We were privileged to be the first to
hear his presentation, but in 2 weeks' time he will be in Europe again, to
speak at the Society of Genealogists, and at my request he put together these
short notes:
"When thirteen bundles of 1841
householders' schedules showed up in the Shropshire archives we could, for the
first time, compare primary records to the census enumerators' books created
from them.
"Enumerators' instructions made
clear their role as editors, but how they applied the rules in transcribing the
schedules of their literate householders (who filled up their own) varied from
district to district. An analysis of the performance of thirteen Shropshire
enumerators at a time when less than half the population could read and write
instils confidence in the overall reliability of the records we use.
"How reliable your particular
ancestor's enumerator was can best be determined (in the absence of surviving
primary records) by answering the question, 'Did he follow the instructions at
the front of his book?'. Some did and some did not. Those annoying diagonal
slash marks made by the London census clerks are tallying marks made to
determine totals for the parliamentary abstracts.
"At other times, however, the
clerks intentionally masked words which had been recorded by overzealous
enumerators. One Shropshire enumerator apparently believed he was supposed to
write something in every box in the column for recording 'profession, trade,
employment or if of independent means'. Most of these were not found on
the householders' schedules! Those deemed irrelevant by the clerks were masked
(but still sometimes decipherable by those with determination).
"If Lost Cousins members want to
see how Louisa Georgeanna Cuyler
ended up as Lucza Bast at
Ancestry and discover the remarkable strengths of the 1841 census they are
encouraged to come to the Society of Genealogists on the afternoon of 17th
September."
You can find more details about Don's
presentation here
- there were only 15 8 places left when I last checked, so don't delay!
Tip:
although Don's presentation relates mainly to the 1841 Census, enumerators of
later censuses are likely to have had similar failings and foibles - it's an
insight into human nature that will help you to understand how secondary
sources like enumeration schedules can both inform and mislead.
Lost manuscript found after
45 years
"A Village of the Moor",
written by writer and naturalist Hope Bourne, and previously thought lost, has
turned up in the archives of the Exmoor Society. At the time it was written it
was rejected as "too contemporaneous", but almost half a century
later it is a window onto a rural community at a time of change which,
according to this BBC news article, will
be published next year.
Dorset couple celebrate
their 80th wedding anniversary!
Nowadays we're used to marriages
breaking up - if couples get married at all - so it was heart-warming to read
this story
about a Dorset couple who have just celebrated their 80th anniversary.
They courted for 4 years before tying
the knot, having met in 1929, the year of the Great Crash. Aged 101 and 102
they still live independently, and according to their son Larry, their secret
is setting themselves targets.
That's good news for family historians -
we're always trying to knock down 'brick walls'!
WW1 PoW records: further
information
Something that wasn't immediately
apparent when I wrote about these records previously is that not all of the
records have been indexed. For example, if you look up the surname Evans you'll
find that there aren't any from the Welsh Regiment listed, which seems
improbable, and when I looked up the surname Jones I couldn't find anyone at
all.
I eventually found an entry on the ICRC blog
which states that "the site will be
steadily updated over the coming six months as further information is placed
online, but it already offers access to all civilian-internee index cards and
to 80 per cent of the cards for military prisoners from Belgium, France, the
United Kingdom and Germany."
So if you haven't yet found a record of
your PoW ancestor, there's a
chance it may show up later in the year (many thanks to Nina for alerting me to
this).
Some of the more unusual
pictures from the Great War
Reuters recently published an eclectic
collection of war photos from the collection of the Archive of Modern Conflict
- you can see them here.
I'd never heard of the Archive of Modern Conflict before, so I searched for
more information, which led me to this YouTube clip.
Watching that short film reminded me
very much of the Stephen Poliakoff drama Shooting
the Past, which had an amazing cast - if you haven't already seen it,
do get the DVD
because it was one of the factors that inspired me to start researching my
family tree.
WW1 officers'
records now searchable online
Thanks to the efforts of volunteers, the
National Archives have created a catalogue of surviving records for army
officers who fought in WW1. Whilst all of the service files for officers were
destroyed during WW2 (along with 60% of the files for other ranks), the pension
records have survived, and in many cases they include copies of information
from the service files.
It's important to note that the records
themselves are not available online - once you've identified the records of interest
you'll need to visit Kew, or ask TNA to quote for providing photocopies. You
can read more on the TNA site here
(thanks also to Graham in Australia for his extremely helpful input).
Medway casualty index
goes live
The Friends of Medway Archives and Local
Studies Centre (FOMA) recently announced the launch of the De Caville
Index, which includes over 4,000 men killed in WW1 taken from memorials all
over the Medway towns, including men born in the area, those stationed there
during hostilities and the Live Bait Squadron.
The index contains unique information
never before included in any other database, including name, dates of birth and
death, rank, record number, address, burial place, and many photographs;
entries are even cross-referenced to indicate family relationships. In addition
there is a facility on the website for relatives and researchers to add
information in order to build up a unique picture of the men who fought one
hundred years ago.
There have been many local projects to
commemorate the centenary of the outbreak of war but this index, which has
taken over a quarter of a century to compile, certainly stands out.
Do you have an Anderson
shelter in your garden?
I was born just 5 years after the end of
WW2, so it wasn't at all surprising that we still had an Anderson shelter in our garden,
though by this time it was being used as a garden shed.
On the other side of the garden was our
coal bunker, which - because we didn't have a side entrance - meant that the
coalman had to bring the dirty sacks through the house. We also had to carry
the dustbin through the house twice a week - no wonder my mother was so
fastidious about dusting and vacuuming the house every day (personally I
thought it was a waste of time, even on the days when I hadn't been roped in to
help).
Anyway, I digress - getting back to
Anderson shelters, the New York Daily
News recently featured a story
about children in England who discovered an old shelter in the grounds of their
primary school (thanks to Kay in Oregon for alerting me).
I'm sure there must be many more
Anderson shelters around - do you still have one in your garden?
PS:
if you don't have an Anderson shelter in your garden, but would like one,
there's one for sale on eBay
(though you'll have to go to Alloa to collect it).
The history of the United
Kingdom
There's a lot of confusion about the
difference between the terms England, Britain, Great Britain, the United
Kingdom, and the British Isles - and it won't get any simpler should voters in
Scotland choose to secede from the union in just over 2 weeks' time.
Until fairly recently the term England
often referred to England & Wales; however England & Wales are more
correctly described as Britain, a term that derives from the Roman name
Britannia. (Around the end of the 2nd century the Romans divided Britannia into
two provinces, Britannia Superior and Britannia Inferior, but that's a tale for
another time - and perhaps another place.)
In 1603 King James VI of Scotland became
King James of England on the death of Queen Elizabeth, but the two nations
retained separate parliaments.
James had succeeded to the throne of
Scotland in 1567, at the age of 13 months, when his mother - Mary Queen of
Scots - was forced to abdicate. She had become Queen when she was just 6 days
old, on the death of her father, James V - who had himself
succeeded at the age of 17 months, when his father, James IV, was killed in
battle. They were times of treachery and intrigue: James IV was put on the
throne at the age of 15 years by rebels who killed his father, James III; Mary
Queen of Scots married the man who some believed had murdered her second
husband; she was eventually executed after being found guilty of plotting the
assassination of her cousin, Queen Elizabeth of England.
In 1707, when Queen Anne was on the
throne, the kingdoms of Scotland and England became the united kingdom of Great
Britain, following separate acts passed by each of the countries' parliaments
(earlier attempts to unite the kingdoms had failed). Anne was the daughter of
James II of England (James VII of Scotland), and when he was deposed in the
"Glorious Revolution" of 1688 her sister Mary and brother-in-law
William of Orange took the throne the following year (this game of 'musical
thrones' was to continue on Anne's death when her distant cousin George Louis,
the Elector of Hannover, became George I).
In 1801 Great Britain and Ireland became
the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland following acts passed by both
parliaments (although the Irish parliament was far from representative of its
population). In 1922 the Irish Free State was created, so from that point
onwards it was the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
The British Isles is a geographical term
for the islands of Ireland and Great Britain, together with thousands of
smaller islands. I sometimes use the term as a convenient way of referring to
the United Kingdom as it was between 1801 and 1921, a period which is of
particular interest to family historians.
Because of the complicated political
history of the islands the incorrect use of any of these terms can be annoying
or even upsetting, so I'm always very careful to pick the right one (though
even when I use them correctly I occasionally get emails from readers who have read
something into my words that wasn't intended). As family historians we need to
be particularly careful how we use words, because what we write might well be
quoted by others.
I'm going to end with some specific
examples which have caused confusion in the past:
Searching for
Scottish cousins
As a family historian, having Scottish
ancestors is good news and bad news. The good news is that Scottish BMD
certificates are more detailed than English certificates, and you can access
the historic registers online, something that those of us with English and
Welsh ancestors have been pleading with the GRO to consider for many years.
The bad news is that the only way to
view the Scottish census images from the comfort of your own home (or indeed
from anywhere outside of Scotland) is to use the Government-owned
ScotlandsPeople site, which is a pay-per-view site. As somebody who rang up a
bill of over £150 in just 12 months at the original 1901 Census site I wince
whenever I come across a pay-per-view site, because I know I'm going to be torn
between researching comprehensively, as I would at a subscription site, and doing
it frugally, in the vain hope that I can get all the answers without running up
a big bill.
Fortunately it is possible to search
transcriptions of the Scottish censuses at Ancestry,
findmypast,
and FamilySearch
- and this can help to keep the cost down. Unfortunately only one of those
three sites (Ancestry) currently includes the census references in their
transcription, so if you want to enter relatives from the Scotland 1881 census
on your My Ancestors page - as I hope
you will - you have a very limited choice of sources.
Note:
Valentine recently drew my attention to a strange problem with Ancestry's 1881
Census whereby people from different households in different streets are listed
as if they are in the same household - for example, if you look up Charles S
Taylor aged 21 at findmypast you'll find him with his parents and 4 brothers,
whereas if you look him up at Ancestry he will appear to be in a household with
4 unrelated people.
The old findmypast site did include the
Scottish census references (although they were wrongly labelled) so I'm fairly
sure that they will be available at the new site in time.
Note:
the odds of finding 'lost cousins' through the 1881 Scotland census have
recently improved significantly, thanks to the members who took part in last
weekend's event (which was publicised by email to everyone who had already
entered Scottish relatives). However there's still some way to go before it
will be as easy to find cousins through the Scottish census as through the
English census.
On your My Summary page
at the LostCousins site there's lots of useful information, but perhaps the
most useful is your 'Match Potential', which estimates
your chances of discovering living relatives based on the entries on your My Ancestors page.
For example, if your
Match Potential is shown as (say) 2.531 this indicates that with average luck
you would have found 2 or 3 new relatives.
To increase your Match Potential add
further entries to your My Ancestors
page; if you focus on the 1881 censuses we use at LostCousins (England &
Wales, Scotland, and Canada) your entries will have a greater impact on your
Match Potential than if you use one of the newer censuses - that's because the
censuses we've been using the longest are the ones your 'lost cousins' are most
likely to have used.
Tip:
once you've entered your direct ancestors and their households the next step is
to enter the members of their extended families. This many involve you in
additional research, because not everyone researches their collateral lines,
but since these are the relatives most likely to link you to your 'lost
cousins' it's well worth doing.
Interestingly, your Match Potential will
increase even if you don't add any more entries - in fact,
it went up by about 1% last month. This is because other members, some of whom
are your 'lost cousins', are entering their own relatives - but if you want the
figure to go up more quickly (and I strongly suspect you do), the best way is
to take matters into your own hands.
Have you been invited to
join the forum?
Although the LostCousins forum hasn't
yet officially opened, the members who have the highest Match Potential have
already been invited to join. This privilege reflects the effort they've put in
- not just to help themselves, but also to help their
cousins.
Why not check your My Summary page to see if you qualify? If you do, there will be a
coupon code to enter when your register at the forum.
If you've got a Yahoo email address (or
one that is managed by Yahoo, such as Sky.com) be prepared for a long wait when
you request a password reminder.
In most cases they delay automatic
emails sent from the LostCousins site by at least 4 hours on the grounds that
they've had complaints from users - which since most of these emails have been
requested by the intended recipients is clearly pure hokum (indeed, if I wasn't
so easy-going I'd call it defamatory).
These delays don't only affect password reminders, they are likely to affect messages sent to you by
your cousins, as well as copies of messages you yourself have sent through the
site.
If your primary email address (ie the one I wrote to in order to tell you about this
newsletter) is a Yahoo-managed address I'd strongly recommend that you provide
a different one - 4 hours is an awfully long time to wait when all you want to
do is log-in.
Tip:
if you choose not to follow my advice, please don't request additional
reminders when your first password reminder fails to arrive; this will make it
look as if we're sending you spam emails, and so can only make matters worse!
The Lost Ancestor -
and other genealogical mysteries
If, like me, you enjoyed Hiding the Past you'll be delighted to hear
that forensic genealogist Morton Farrier is back to solve another challenging
mystery, courtesy of author Nathan Dylan Goodwin. I haven't yet read The
Lost Ancestor but it's sitting on my Kindle just waiting for me to find
the time. There should be a paperback version soon - I'll let you know more in
the next newsletter.
Another genealogical mystery with 'Lost'
in the title is due out next month: The
Lost Empress by Steve Robinson is the 4th in his series of mysteries
featuring genealogist Jefferson Tayte. I'm sure everyone reading this newsletter has
read at least one of Steve's earlier books (In
the Blood, To
the Grave, and The
Last Queen of England), so you don't need me to tell you how good a
writer he is.
One book that has been recommended to me
by several members, but hasn't featured in my newsletter until now is Where's Merrill, by Gearoid
O'Neary. Although the author is Irish, the genealogy
is American, which doesn't appeal to me as much - and has resulted in a fairly
mixed bag of reviews
at Amazon.co.uk (although, to be fair, 9 out of 15 readers gave it 5 stars).
Professional Genealogists
put to the Test
The Association of Genealogists and
Researchers in Archives (AGRA) have strengthened their criteria for Membership
and Associate Membership. In future all applicants wishing to join the
association will now have to attend an interview, and in most cases will also
be asked to undergo practical tests. The new rules also attach greater
importance to formal qualifications and ongoing learning.
Geoff Swinfield,
who is a member of AGRA's Board of Assessors, said that "AGRA plays a key
role in setting standards within the profession. If AGRA is to be relevant in
the future it must give its Members the opportunity to demonstrate that they
meet the exacting standards which fit them to offer their services to the
fee-paying public."
In my opinion you are the best
person to research your family history - but if you don't have time, or if you
have reached the point where specialist expertise is needed, you can't do
better than choose an AGRA member.
More blackberries this
weekend, which was a bit of a surprise, because when I was young I was taught
that you had to pick them no later than August Bank Holiday. Is it global warming - or just the fact that Bank
Holiday Monday was earlier than usual?
I bought my wife a new phone for her
birthday (I know it doesn't sound very romantic, but they are fashion items these days) and we're going to take the
opportunity to switch her from Orange to GiffGaff. This
will save her at least £10 a month, and she'll also be able to use her new
phone as a WiFi hotspot, which she couldn't do with
her old phone.
This week I suffered my first bad debt
at Zopa - a mere 86p -
but in any case the loss was covered by the Safeguard fund that Zopa set up
last year to protect members against losses. Considering that I've been earning
around 5% on my savings I couldn't be happier about the way things have worked
out!
If you do decide to follow my example,
and end up investing £2000 or more, we can each get a £50 bonus provided you
register using this link.
And while interest rates for savers are generally still in the doldrums, Zopa
are currently guaranteeing that you'll get a minimum of 5.2% on 4 and 5 year
loans (after charges).
Finally, just to confirm (following my
Stop Press mention last time) that Amazon are still offering the Kindle Fire HD
at just £89, a reduction of £30 - follow this link
for more details.
I didn't quite get the blackberry story right -
see the next issue for an update; also the JONES entries on the ICRC site can be found
by searching for JOHNE (thanks, Steve for that tip).
Thanks for taking the time to read my
newsletter - I hope you find it useful.
Peter Calver
Founder, LostCousins
© Copyright 2014 Peter Calver
You
MAY link to this newsletter or email a link to your friends and relatives
without asking for permission in advance - I have included bookmarks so you can
link to a specific article: right-click on the relevant entry in the table of
contents at the beginning of this newsletter to copy the link. But why not
invite them to join instead?